josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote in message news:<9312d9f1.0307151829.45159695@posting.google. com>...

> Here is the pertinent paragraph of the Presidents address
> to the Congress.
>
> "... The British government has learned that Saddam
> Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium
> from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has
> attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable
> for nuclear weapons production. "
>
> Where is the lie?

he was fully informed that the uranium info was bogus and that the
tubes were not suitable for nuclear production. so if he didnt
technically lie, he still knowingly decieved the nation. and that is
just the tip of the iceberg of deception used to drum up support for
this, the crime of the century.

"jose soplar" <josesoplar@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9312d9f1.0307160642.44366f2f@posting.google.c om...
> google.news.bs2@spamgourmet.com (Bill Stender) wrote in message
news:<9fa0389c.0307152125.7a368d3d@posting.google. com>...
> > josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote in message
news:<9312d9f1.0307151829.45159695@posting.google. com>...
> >
> > > Here is the pertinent paragraph of the Presidents address
> > > to the Congress.
> > >
> > > "... The British government has learned that Saddam
> > > Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium
> > > from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has
> > > attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable
> > > for nuclear weapons production. "
> > >
> > > Where is the lie?
> >
> > he was fully informed that the uranium info was bogus and that the
> > tubes were not suitable for nuclear production. so if he didnt
> > technically lie, he still knowingly decieved the nation. and that is
> > just the tip of the iceberg of deception used to drum up support for
> > this, the crime of the century.
>
>
> Who says? Cite?

We have Bill Clinton to thank for the way this will turn out. "It all
depends upon what one's definition of "is" is".

So, the British intelligence said blah blah. Bush said the British
intelligence said blah blah blah. But blah blah blah was incorrect, a lie
even and Bush knew it was incorrect or a lie in advance. But, what is "is"
in this case? Because Bush knew blah, blah, blah was incorrect and a lie
does that mean that Bush lied when he said the British said blah, blah,
blah. Of course not and the American voter will ignore this right out of
hand in the voting booth.


--
A lot of little boys never grow up.
They just change the name of
their game from "Cowboys and
Indians" to "Democrats and Republicans"


Brooks Gregory