This quote alone should be enough to justify it:

"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that
the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal
weapons ever devised."

George W. Bush
March 17, 2003


.....so on March 17th, three days before the invasion, Bush says he had proof
that left "no doubt".

Ok....where is it?

All proof presented must be from March 17th or prior or Bush is a
liar.....who lied to go to war.

What I don't understand is people who ignore all the solid proof Bush did
lie, but continue to support Bush's assertions...in the absence of any
proof from him to support them.

Eh?

....so Iraq was no threat. Bush went ahead with an illegal invasion and as a
direct result at least 214 Americans are dfead plus thousands of Iraqis.
The wounded, disabled and disfigured would be many times that number on
both sides.

Bush...who took the Presidency without honor...has gone downhill since then
to the extent of lying so he can go to war.

No wonder he opposes the International Criminal Court. He should be standing
trial before it if no corrupted American court has the integrity to see
justice done.

--
Steve
--
"Naturally, the common people don't want war;
neither in Russia nor in England nor in America,
nor for that matter in Germany.
That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders
of the country who determine the policy and
it is always a simple matter to drag the people
along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist
dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them
they are being attacked and denounce the
pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing
the country to danger. It works the same way
in any country."
- Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshall

"Jeff Ayers" <jeff.ayers@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ICIQa.62708$ye4.44496@sccrnsc01...
> Why? When Clinton bombed an aspirin factory based on faulty CIA
information,
> did you call for his impeachment?

1) "what about clinton, what about Clinton?" isn't an argument
2) President Clinton did not lie to the nation trying to get the USA to
commit itself to a war and rebuilding of a country. Just about every piller
of the Administrations case for the pre-emptive war has fallen apart. No
WMDs, no immediate threat, no Nukes, no attempts to buy nuclear materials.

Dubya ought to be Impeached, removed from office, and tossed in Prison.


>
> Jeff
>
> "Steve" <steve@nospam4me.org> wrote in message
> news:MbHQa.4877$9f7.567913@news02.tsnz.net...
> >
> > This quote alone should be enough to justify it:
> >
> > "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt
that
> > the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal
> > weapons ever devised."
> >
> > George W. Bush
> > March 17, 2003
> >
> >
> > ....so on March 17th, three days before the invasion, Bush says he had
> proof
> > that left "no doubt".
> >
> > Ok....where is it?
> >
> > All proof presented must be from March 17th or prior or Bush is a
> > liar.....who lied to go to war.
> >
> > What I don't understand is people who ignore all the solid proof Bush
did
> > lie, but continue to support Bush's assertions...in the absence of any
> > proof from him to support them.
> >
> > Eh?
> >
> > ...so Iraq was no threat. Bush went ahead with an illegal invasion and
as
> a
> > direct result at least 214 Americans are dfead plus thousands of Iraqis.
> > The wounded, disabled and disfigured would be many times that number on
> > both sides.
> >
> > Bush...who took the Presidency without honor...has gone downhill since
> then
> > to the extent of lying so he can go to war.
> >
> > No wonder he opposes the International Criminal Court. He should be
> standing
> > trial before it if no corrupted American court has the integrity to see
> > justice done.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > --
> > "Naturally, the common people don't want war;
> > neither in Russia nor in England nor in America,
> > nor for that matter in Germany.
> > That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders
> > of the country who determine the policy and
> > it is always a simple matter to drag the people
> > along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist
> > dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist
> > dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
> > always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
> > That is easy. All you have to do is tell them
> > they are being attacked and denounce the
> > pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing
> > the country to danger. It works the same way
> > in any country."
> > - Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshall
> >
>
>