Bush Must Resign or be Impeached - Page 2

Matthew Crouch · Matthew Crouch

dave, do you ever get confused about whom you're arguing with or even
*whether* you're arguing?

"dave" <dave@gbronline.com> wrote in message
news:OaCdncqHQKoHNomiXTWJjg@gbronline.com...
>
> "Matthew Crouch" <matthew.crouch@spamlessverizon.net> wrote in message
> news

TZQa.1345$EZ2.1179@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> > > Did Clinton know that it was an aspirin factory, yet stand before
> > > congress and the American public and claim that it was not in order to
> > > justify a war?
> >
> > No, he just fired off the rockets. I think Clinton was more obviously
> > not-enamored with the idea of the rule of law.
> > Note: it was more obvious, but I don't know that he was any less
> enamored...
> >
> > >
> > > Also, I notice some of you Bush lap-dogs are trying to make it seem
> > > like the "16 words" are the only thing in question. Those 16 words
are
> > > just a small part of a much more complex set of deceptions,
> > > implications, misleading contexts and other things which can be
> > > plausibly denied as "lies".
> >
> > Very true...chalk it up to our soundbyte culture. No one seems to have
the
> > stomach for a broad analysis of the holistic effects of that speech,
> > Powell's presentation, etc. etc.
> >
> > No one?
> >
> Bush has even less respect for rule of law. He has even less than Nixon or
> Reagan!
>
>

dave · dave

"Matthew Crouch" <matthew.crouch@spamlessverizon.net> wrote in message
news:cG4Ra.3280$EZ2.894@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> dave, do you ever get confused about whom you're arguing with or even
> *whether* you're arguing?
>
I didn't really consider that arguing, just that I am so tired of hearing
Clinton brought up when Bush has taken trust and honesty to new lows.

Transition Zone · Transition Zone

"dave" <dave@gbronline.com> wrote in message news:<bQmdnROgZIjINomiXTWJgA@gbronline.com>...
> "z" <z@yada.yada.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93B948B6527D0zyadayadayada@206.127.4.22...
> > "dave" <dave@gbronline.com> wrote in
> > news:RIScnZABT-aqU46iXTWJhA@gbronline.com:
> >
> > >
> > > "z" <z@yada.yada.com> wrote in message
> > > news:Xns93B8D068433Ezyadayadayada@206.127.4.22...
> > >> "Jeff Ayers" <jeff.ayers@comcast.net> wrote in
> > >> news:ICIQa.62708$ye4.44496@sccrnsc01:
> > >>
> > >> > Why? When Clinton bombed an aspirin factory based on faulty CIA
> > >> > information, did you call for his impeachment?
> > >> >
> > >> > Jeff
> > >>
> > >> clinton was an ass -- he wasn't costing us 1 billion a fucking month.
> > >> People die every day and governments do stupid shit -- but when it
> > >> costs YOU and ME that kind of cash it's time to put a stop to it.
> > >> Forget human rights, forget WMD, forget all that.. bottom line is
> > >> this is costing us a shitload of dough and I'm tired of it
> > >
> > >
> > > $5 billion a month combining Iraq and Afghanistan. Job losses and
> > > unfunded Homeland Security here.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > i know -- i meant a billion a week. Geez you know its bad when you are
> off
> > by a factor of 4 or 5 but it's still a valid argument. A billion a month
> > would be bad.. a billion a week HOLY FUCKING CRAP. What crack are those
> > guys smoking?
>
> Pretzel Crack. It's a new White House formulation.

Nice little crack-pipe burn to boot.

creosote · creosote

Steve <steve@nospam4me.org> wrote in message news:<MbHQa.4877$9f7.567913@news02.tsnz.net>...
> This quote alone should be enough to justify it:
>
> "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that
> the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal
> weapons ever devised."
>
> George W. Bush
> March 17, 2003
>
>
> ....so on March 17th, three days before the invasion, Bush says he had proof
> that left "no doubt".
>
> Ok....where is it?

My best guess is that during the protracted period when Bush was
"waiting for the inspections to work" instead of invading when he
wanted to, as demanded by people like you, the weapons were dismantled
and shipped out of the country. This sleight of hand was accomplished
in the very manner the French, the Russians, the Germans, and the left
in America hoped it would be. Liars like you have no business calling
anyone else a liar, and if you think this ho hum issue is enough to
impeach a president, you'd better have your boyfriend pull out of your
ass a moment so that you can think a little straighter.

Matthew Crouch	[11] Posted by Matthew Crouch 07-16-2003, 01:39 AM
Posts: n/a	Quote dave, do you ever get confused about whom you're arguing with or even whether you're arguing? "dave" <dave@gbronline.com> wrote in message news:OaCdncqHQKoHNomiXTWJjg@gbronline.com... > > "Matthew Crouch" <matthew.crouch@spamlessverizon.net> wrote in message > newsTZQa.1345$EZ2.1179@nwrddc01.gnilink.net... > > > Did Clinton know that it was an aspirin factory, yet stand before > > > congress and the American public and claim that it was not in order to > > > justify a war? > > > > No, he just fired off the rockets. I think Clinton was more obviously > > not-enamored with the idea of the rule of law. > > Note: it was more obvious, but I don't know that he was any less > enamored... > > > > > > > > Also, I notice some of you Bush lap-dogs are trying to make it seem > > > like the "16 words" are the only thing in question. Those 16 words are > > > just a small part of a much more complex set of deceptions, > > > implications, misleading contexts and other things which can be > > > plausibly denied as "lies". > > > > Very true...chalk it up to our soundbyte culture. No one seems to have the > > stomach for a broad analysis of the holistic effects of that speech, > > Powell's presentation, etc. etc. > > > > No one? > > > Bush has even less respect for rule of law. He has even less than Nixon or > Reagan! > >
Posts: n/a

dave	[12] Posted by dave 07-16-2003, 07:50 AM
Posts: n/a	Quote "Matthew Crouch" <matthew.crouch@spamlessverizon.net> wrote in message news:cG4Ra.3280$EZ2.894@nwrddc01.gnilink.net... > dave, do you ever get confused about whom you're arguing with or even > whether you're arguing? > I didn't really consider that arguing, just that I am so tired of hearing Clinton brought up when Bush has taken trust and honesty to new lows.
Posts: n/a

Transition Zone	[13] Posted by Transition Zone 07-16-2003, 11:06 AM
Posts: n/a	Quote "dave" <dave@gbronline.com> wrote in message news:<bQmdnROgZIjINomiXTWJgA@gbronline.com>... > "z" <z@yada.yada.com> wrote in message > news:Xns93B948B6527D0zyadayadayada@206.127.4.22... > > "dave" <dave@gbronline.com> wrote in > > news:RIScnZABT-aqU46iXTWJhA@gbronline.com: > > > > > > > > "z" <z@yada.yada.com> wrote in message > > > news:Xns93B8D068433Ezyadayadayada@206.127.4.22... > > >> "Jeff Ayers" <jeff.ayers@comcast.net> wrote in > > >> news:ICIQa.62708$ye4.44496@sccrnsc01: > > >> > > >> > Why? When Clinton bombed an aspirin factory based on faulty CIA > > >> > information, did you call for his impeachment? > > >> > > > >> > Jeff > > >> > > >> clinton was an ass -- he wasn't costing us 1 billion a fucking month. > > >> People die every day and governments do stupid shit -- but when it > > >> costs YOU and ME that kind of cash it's time to put a stop to it. > > >> Forget human rights, forget WMD, forget all that.. bottom line is > > >> this is costing us a shitload of dough and I'm tired of it > > > > > > > > > $5 billion a month combining Iraq and Afghanistan. Job losses and > > > unfunded Homeland Security here. > > > > > > > > > > i know -- i meant a billion a week. Geez you know its bad when you are > off > > by a factor of 4 or 5 but it's still a valid argument. A billion a month > > would be bad.. a billion a week HOLY FUCKING CRAP. What crack are those > > guys smoking? > > Pretzel Crack. It's a new White House formulation. Nice little crack-pipe burn to boot.
Posts: n/a

creosote	[14] Posted by creosote 07-16-2003, 12:34 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote Steve <steve@nospam4me.org> wrote in message news:<MbHQa.4877$9f7.567913@news02.tsnz.net>... > This quote alone should be enough to justify it: > > "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that > the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal > weapons ever devised." > > George W. Bush > March 17, 2003 > > > ....so on March 17th, three days before the invasion, Bush says he had proof > that left "no doubt". > > Ok....where is it? My best guess is that during the protracted period when Bush was "waiting for the inspections to work" instead of invading when he wanted to, as demanded by people like you, the weapons were dismantled and shipped out of the country. This sleight of hand was accomplished in the very manner the French, the Russians, the Germans, and the left in America hoped it would be. Liars like you have no business calling anyone else a liar, and if you think this ho hum issue is enough to impeach a president, you'd better have your boyfriend pull out of your ass a moment so that you can think a little straighter.
Posts: n/a

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Re: The Raw Truth About Jr's Military Desertion	Joe S.	Politics	42	07-14-2003 10:57 AM
Re: The Son of Man demands Mr. bush's immediate arrest or execution! - Wow eh?!	Justice for All	Politics	0	07-11-2003 03:50 PM
Re: The Raw Truth About Jr's Military Desertion	Thom	Politics	5	07-05-2003 02:49 PM
Iraq: Who lied? The high cost of lying about war.	Harry Hope	Politics	1	07-03-2003 02:30 PM
Impeach the wimpy asshole!	Harry Hope	Politics	1	07-03-2003 02:29 PM