http://observer.guardian.co.uk/inter...997243,00.html

Blair ignored CIA weapons warning

Intelligence breakdown after Britain dismissed US doubts over Iraq nuclear
link to Niger

Kamal Ahmed, political editor
Sunday July 13, 2003
The Observer

Britain and America suffered a complete breakdown in relations over vital
evidence against Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction, refusing to
share information and keeping each other in the dark over key elements of
the case against the Iraqi dictator.
In a remarkable letter released last night, the Foreign Secretary, Jack
Straw, reveals a catalogue of disputes between the two countries, lending
more ammunition to critics of the war and exerting fresh pressure on the
Prime Minister.

The letter to the Foreign Affairs Committee, which investigated the case for
war against Iraq, reveals that Britain ignored a request from the CIA to
remove claims that Saddam was trying to buy nuclear material from Niger,
despite concerns that the allegations were bogus. It also details a
government decision to block information going to the CIA because it was too
sensitive.

As diplomatic relations between America and Britain become increasingly
strained over Iraq's WMD, Straw said that the Government had separate
evidence of the Niger link, which it has not shared with the US.

The revelations come just four days before Tony Blair travels to America for
his toughest visit there since he came to power in 1997. As well as WMD, the
Prime Minister will also raise Britain's 'serious concerns' over the
treatment of British citizens held at Guantanamo Bay.

Straw's letter reveals:

· That evidence given to the CIA by the former US ambassador to Gabon,
Joseph Wilson - that Niger officials had denied any link - was never shared
with the British.

· That Foreign Office officials were left to read reports of Wilson's
findings in the press only days before they were raised as part of the
committee's inquiry into the war.

· That when the CIA, having seen a draft of the September dossier on Iraq's
WMD, demanded that the Niger claim be removed, it was ignored because the
agency did not back it up with 'any explanation'.

Although publicly the two governments are trying to maintain a united front,
the admission two days ago by the head of the CIA, George Tenet, that
President Bush should never have made the claim about the Niger connection
to Iraq, has left British officials exposed.

Last night, Downing Street and Foreign Office sources said that 'they would
not blink' over the Niger claims. One Downing Street figure said that they
were based on intelligence from a third country that was reliable. 'We are
not backing down,' he said.

Another official said that the claim was based on the 'intelligence
assessment' made at the time, leaving the door open to a climbdown if the
intelligence is found to be wrong.

'I want to make it clear that neither I nor, to the best of my knowledge,
any UK officials were aware of Ambassador Wilson's visit until reference
first appeared in the press,' Straw said in the letter.

'The media has reported that the CIA expressed reservations to us about this
element [the Niger connection] of the September dossier. This is correct.
However, the US comment was unsupported by explanation and UK officials were
confident that the dossier's statement was based on reliable intelligence
which had not been shared with the US. A judgment was therefore made to
retain it.'

Straw said that the Joint Intelligence Committee's assessment of the Iraqi
nuclear threat did not just rest on attempts to procure uranium. There was
also other evidence of links between the two countries and attempts to sign
export deals.

Robin Cook, the former Foreign Secretary who has become a trenchant critic
of the Government's case for war against Iraq, said that it 'stretched
credibility' to say that the Americans and the British had failed to share
such basic information.

'From all I know of the intimate relationship between the CIA and the Secret
Intelligence Services, I find it hard to credit that there was such a
breakdown of communication between them,' Cook said.

'It is time the Government came clean and published the evidence. The longer
it delays, the greater the suspicion will become that it didn't really
believe it itself.

'There is one simple question it must answer. Why did its evidence of the
uranium deal not convince the CIA? If it was not good enough to be in the
President's address, it was not good enough to go in the Prime Minister's
dossier.'

Yesterday, in another damaging broadside, Richard Butler, who was executive
chairman of the United Nations Special Commission to Iraq from 1997 to 1999,
said that anyone who had claimed that there was a link between Niger and
Iraq should resign.

Referring to Australian politicians who had made similar claims, only to
withdraw them and apologise later, Butler said: 'In the justification for
the war, these claims were false and known to be false.

'A Minister who misleads Parliament must accept responsibility for it and
resign. Ministers must be held responsible, not public servants.'



--
--
FAIR USE NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and
social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so
long as I'm the dictator." - GW Bush 12/18/2000.

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic
and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
---Theodore Roosevelt

"Feels Good!"
---George W. Bush on the Brink of Declaring War on Iraq.