|
![]() |
|
|
[31] Posted by Stan de SD 07-09-2003, 02:18 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message news:dtvlgv4uajoa2u21rg6l4qcb720q04bgu8@4ax.com... > On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 07:01:04 GMT, "Stan de SD" > <standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > >"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message > >news:itqjgvco1rf6qctf24l9njrnetoevs2vc6@4ax.com.. . > >> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:45:41 GMT, "Stan de SD" > >> <standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: > >> > >> >Enron's bankrupt - hardly a sign of being fantastically successful. > >> > >> That does not preclude the successes they did have and would > >> have continued to have had they not been caught at their game. > >> And in fact had they not decided to cheat, they *might* easily have > >> still been successful in their original mission. > > > >I find in interesting how you have gone to so much work to twist the > >original discussion regarding Wal-Mart and McDonald's - 2 companies that > >have been highly successful by offering people what they want in the > >marketplace - with Enron, a bankrupt organization that needed the strongarm > >support of the Clinton administration and shady accounting practices to keep > >it afloat. Is this your way of avoiding the central issue of my original > >post, or just a sign that you are so hopelessly confused that you can't tell > >the difference? > > > Follow the thread. I was not the one who brought up Enron originally. > I simply answered a post from Stan saying it was not successful. Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject (interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they need to change the subject. > It was successful. Just got caught at being crooked. Many > corporations don't get caught Most likely because those corporations haven't broken the law. > >> During the late 1990s and early 2000s, Enron was a trading powerhouse. > >> The firm, which had started as a US natural gas pipeline company, > >> started trading energies, then launched into new markets, including > >> metals, paper, water, weather and bandwidth. For a time, it seamed > >> that everything Enron touched turned to gold. The firm attracted some > >> of the best talent, first from the energy industry, and then from Wall > >> Street. In 2001, the Enron empire collapsed. The firm's bankruptcy was > >> the largest in US history, surpassed seven months later by WorldCom's > >> bankruptcy. > > > >Is this your way of saying "Polly want a cracker"??? > > > Is this your way of answering facts? Is this your way of lamely pretending I haven't answered them? |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
[32] Posted by toto 07-09-2003, 02:28 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD"
<standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they >need to change the subject. Nah. I can deal with both Walmart and McDonald's. So, let's begin with Walmart. What do you think the economic impact of having Walmart's move into an area is and why do you believe that local government by the will of its people should not have control over the businesses it licenses. It can deny licenses to other businesses, why not to Walmart? The small businesses have no recourse when a town says no, why should Walmart have more? Because it has more money? When a WalMart sprouts on the landscape, a flurry of “satellite†commercial and retail development generally follows in the vicinity. Soon, a concrete and halogen Mecca stands indistinguishable from any such place in the country. This occursunder the twin auspices of progress and development. But who will truly benefit, and at what cost to the community? Will it benefit the local economy? WalMart says they provide jobs and an influx of tax revenue. In reality, WalMart displaces employment opportunities by putting other retailers out of business. In Hibbing, 171 jobs were lost within one year of the opening of a WalMart super center. Of those, 45 were union jobs that provided living wages and benefits. The jobs that WalMart brings to a community average $7.50 per hour. An average WalMart employee makes about $11,700 per year - nearly $2,000 below the poverty line for a single mother with two children. WalMart is facing class action lawsuits in 28 states for forced off-the-clock work and unpaid overtime. One half of WalMart’s one million American employees qualify for federal food stamp, housing, and medical assistance. These taxpayer-funded programs subsidize WalMart's low wage policies and offset any tax benefits accrued to residents and consumers. One dollar spent in a local business translates into five dollars of local economic impact. What we spend at WalMart departs immediately by way of dividend and interest payments to lenders and shareholders. And WalMart does not purchase any significant amount of goods or services from local manufacturers or suppliers. WalMarts siphon business from small local retailers. After all, it is much easier to follow the bright lights and big signs to WalMart than to search for a small-town hardware or drug store. -- Dorothy There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens .. Outer Limits |
|
|
|
[33] Posted by toto 07-09-2003, 02:41 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD"
<standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they >need to change the subject. Now for McDonald's.. Just one story here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/1466398.stm McDonald's will employ illegal workers if they can get away with it. I guess that's ok with you and we shouldn't regulate them at all. The story above happens to be from England, but I am quite sure that these practices can occur elsewhere considering how little corporate oversight really does in such cases. This particular McD's franchise did break the law and get caught. Others probably don't get caught. More in next post -- Dorothy There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens .. Outer Limits |
|
|
|
[34] Posted by toto 07-09-2003, 02:42 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD"
<standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they >need to change the subject. Now for McDonald's... As for McD's success, well http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=36533 STRUGGLING MCDONALD'S TO SLASH 600 JOBS Will Also Close 175 Stores Worldwide in Cost-Cutting Efforts November 08, 2002 QwikFIND ID: AAO19M By Kate MacArthur CHICAGO (AdAge.com) -- McDonald's Corp. is slashing jobs and closing stores to cut costs as the world's largest fast-food burger chain wages a discounting battle for share amid weaker-than-expected sales. The company today said it is cutting 400 to 600 worldwide positions, with at least half from the U.S. It didn't identify what departments or units would be affected, but already several high-level executives reportedly have left the marketing department. 175 units to close The burger chain also will shutter 175 poorly performing units in 10 countries and exit seven countries in the Middle East and Latin America. McDonald's is retreating entirely from three countries and transferring ownership to developmental licensees in four others, from where it will now receive royalty payments. As a result, McDonald's is cutting its fourth-quarter pretax income by $350 million, to $425 million. "These actions are the right things to do for McDonald's shareholders, the brand and our business," Chairman-CEO Jack Greenberg said in a statement. "We remain focused on growing our existing restaurants' sales and we're committed to making the changes necessary to succeed in the challenging worldwide economic and competitive environments in which we operate." Last month, Mr. Greenberg said McDonald's was reviewing its "general and administrative" expenses that would result in job losses. At the time, he said he hoped the cuts wouldn't be significant. Not enough Some observers have already said the cuts didn't go deep enough. Like-for-like domestic October sales fell by 0.6% and were lower than previously targeted, prompting McDonald's to back off of its earlier earnings targets. "The fact that McDonald's did not generate flat-to-positive [comparisons] in October given the easy year-on-year comparison and the significantly boosted advertising spend is highly disconcerting," said Mark Kalinowski, restaurant analyst with Salomon Smith Barney. He lowered his earnings forecasts for the quarter and the year by 2 cents, to 32 cents and $1.40, respectively. He also said more closures "might be prudent," citing franchisee comments that the company should close 1,000 units. -- Dorothy There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens .. Outer Limits |
|
|
|
[35] Posted by toto 07-09-2003, 02:49 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD"
<standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they >need to change the subject. Now for McDonald's... And then there is the question of what is in those burgers and of how McD's and other fast food companies have made work more hazardous for those who work in today's slaughterhouses because they have so much economic clout over the industry. Read the well-researched book Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser. http://www.gristmagazine.com/grist/b...ooks081001.asp Then there's the food. Three companies grow and process about 80 percent of all French fries now served by fast food chains. "The multinational food companies," writes Schlosser, "operate French fry plants in a number of different regions, constantly shifting production to take advantage of the lowest potato prices. The economic fortunes of individual farmers or local communities matter little in the grand scheme." The same practices are true in the ranching, poultry, and hog industries. And if industrial, chemical-reliant farming isn't disturbing enough, Schlosser next reveals "why the fries taste good." "Flavorists" in laboratories along the New Jersey turnpike concoct the "natural and artificial flavors" found in almost every processed food product. McDonald's infuses its fries and chicken sandwiches with essences that mimic beef tallow. A milkshake's strawberry flavor is more likely to come from a test tube than from actual fruit. Yet the list of volatile chemicals in artificial fruit flavors sounds benign after reading the story behind a "quarter-pounder." To witness the gruesome business of meat-processing, Schlosser visited slaughterhouses. What he discovered was both repugnant and hazardous. Among the mostly unskilled workforce, severe injuries are common. The meat-processing industry and restaurant chains continually lobby against regulations that would improve worker and food safety. "Anyone who brings raw ground beef into his or her kitchen today must regard it as a potential biohazard," writes Schlosser. High-volume meat production makes it easy for virulent strains of bacteria to travel far and wide. Schlosser minces no words in explaining a major source of contamination. It's simple, he says: "There is shit in the meat." -- Dorothy There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens .. Outer Limits |
|
|
|
[36] Posted by Stan de SD 07-09-2003, 02:52 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@nospam.net> wrote in message news:n8MOa.122$dk4.6514@typhoon.sonic.net... > > Tempest wrote in message <3F0B7383.C9B508E@hotmail.com>... > > > > > >Huckleberry Hoshimoto wrote: > >> > >> Non-Union Wal-Mart........Alriiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, GO WAL-MART! > >> Odd how Wal-mard is one of the few chain NOT losing money. > >> Union wages have sent many businesses over into Mexico. > >> Gee, I wonder why! "Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhh". > > > >You don't suppose Walmart's buying of goods produced in China by slave > >labor has anything to do with it, do you? Or the poverty level wages > >they pay in the U.S.? > > Could be. There are obviously lots of people who are glad to > be able to get those wages. You wanna take them away? That would truly illustrate the perverse compassion of the left: "We don't think it's right for you to work for X dollars an hour, so we will eliminate your job to make sure you're not exploited"... :O| |
|
|
|
[37] Posted by toto 07-09-2003, 03:08 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD"
<standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they >need to change the subject. Nah. I can deal with both Walmart and McDonald's. Walmart facts The Maine Department of Labor ordered Wal-Mart to pay the largest fine in state history for violating child labor laws. The Department of Labor discovered 1,436 child labor law infractions at twenty Wal-Mart chains. Employees from Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Washington, Illinois, Iowa, and West Virginia have sued Wal-Mart for underpaying its hourly workers. Employees from Missouri and Kansas have filed class-action suits alleging “acts of wage abuse.†These acts include neglecting to pay workers overtime, preventing rest and lunch breaks, and forcing them to “work off the clock.†The NLRB also filed a suit against the Jacksonville, Texas Wal-Mart for unfair labor practices. It alleges that Wal-Mart threatened meat cutters, interrogated them regarding their union sympathies, and fired those who are pro-union. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union has filed a complaint with the NLRB alleging that two workers were fired because of their union organizing activities. The EEOC is suing Wal-Mart over allegations of sexual harassment of female employees in Alabama. *Nearly three-quarters of a million women work as “sales associates†in Wal-Mart stores. On average these women earn $6.10 per hour, or $12,688 per year if they are permitted to work full-time. This wage puts many of their families below the poverty level — half even qualify for federal assistance under the food stamp program Women who make pants in El Salvador earn 15 cents for each pair; Wal-Mart sells these pants for $16.95 in its U.S. stores. Also, contractors in El Salvador force workers to take pregnancy tests. According to Brandeis University Professor Ellen I. Rosen, women in Central America who make clothes for Wal-Mart live in shacks lacking running water or plumbing while women in China live nine to twelve to a room in government-provided dormitories. Some of Wal-Mart’s workers in the U.S. spend their nights in trucks of motel rooms without cooking facilities -- Dorothy There is no sound, no cry in all the world that can be heard unless someone listens .. Outer Limits |
|
|
|
[38] Posted by Stan de SD 07-10-2003, 12:19 AM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message news:lukogvs27j4t1o41t8q2rlrrcqi5fulj22@4ax.com... > On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD" > <standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing > >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart > >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject > >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an > >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always > >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they > >need to change the subject. > > Now for McDonald's.. > > Just one story here > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/1466398.stm > > McDonald's will employ illegal workers if they can get away > with it. I guess that's ok with you and we shouldn't regulate > them at all. So toto, you are concerned that employers are hiring illegals. Fine, so explain what steps one should take to make sure that illegals aren't hired, given the following: * Documents such as social security cards and Resident Alien (green) cards are repeatedly forged. Back in the 1980's, my employer (a photo lab in San Diego, CA) participated in a sting operation with the INS where individuals were photographing forged documents and printing out duplicates. A green card went for about $300 on the streets, SS cards were about $200. The technology has been changed, but the forgers have apparently risen to the occasion and are forgeing the new "holographic" cards as well. * Driver's licences were traditionally used for ID, but there is no way to tell the immigration or work authorization status of the individual merely by looking at the card. People have proposed including some code on the card to determine that status, but the so called "civil rights advocates" (mainly liberal lawyers) have fought that suggestion. In fact, liberals are now trying to make it easier for illegals to get driver's licenses in the name of "public safety". * Voter registration cards were once used to determine citizenship as well, but it's becoming obvious that being registered to vote is no longer a guarantee of citizenship. The liberals push for "motor voter" legislation (providing voter registration material to anyone applying for a license at the DMV) is only going to increase voter fraud. * There is no real "one stop" verification system where employers can either call in with ID or go on-line, so employers have no way of telling whether the documentation they are given is authentic or not. Individuals HAVE proposed such a system, but once again, the liberals have screamed about the (nonexistent) "right to privacy" to put the kibosh on that. * The fear of harrassment by so-called "civil rights" groups causes many employers to accept spurious documentation when hiring suspected illegal aliens. I remember working in one place in southern California where the personnel director would go over the documents of obviously US-born and raised individuals with a fine-toothed comb, but would only give a cursory glance to documentation presented by immigrant workers of a certain ethnicity who possessed SSN cards that were patently bogus (first number issued for the NE US for somebody who allegedly lived in Tijuana). Apprarently many of these companies are more scared of "discrimination" suits by La Raza lawyers than they are of getting in trouble with the INS. Pardon me, toto, but I get jaded and cynical when I hear liberals worried about companies hiring illegal immigrants, given that they have contributed to the current mess... > The story above happens to be from England, So you can't blame Bush for it, right? > but I am quite sure that these practices can occur elsewhere > considering how little corporate oversight really does in such > cases. > > This particular McD's franchise did break the law and get > caught. Others probably don't get caught. You know that members of other groups (minorities, for example) are caught breaking the law. We don't have any proof that others break the law, but can we assume that they did and just didn't get caught? Perhaps we can go off on screeds against minorities as well, because we catch some of them breaking the law? |
|
|
|
[39] Posted by Stan de SD 07-10-2003, 12:19 AM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message news:sukogv0v8s9mrigqidjb0n03qirqlachgu@4ax.com... > On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD" > <standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing > >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart > >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject > >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an > >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always > >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they > >need to change the subject. > > Now for McDonald's... > > As for McD's success, well > > http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=36533 > > STRUGGLING MCDONALD'S TO SLASH 600 JOBS > Will Also Close 175 Stores Worldwide in Cost-Cutting Efforts > November 08, 2002 > QwikFIND ID: AAO19M > By Kate MacArthur > > CHICAGO (AdAge.com) -- McDonald's Corp. is slashing > jobs and closing stores to cut costs as the world's largest > fast-food burger chain wages a discounting battle for share > amid weaker-than-expected sales. So McDonalds is cutting back due to a weak economy. Your point, or did you have one to make? |
|
|
|
[40] Posted by Stan de SD 07-10-2003, 12:26 AM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message news:e5logvsl67tqvogmbkd7jjltt354kogpt5@4ax.com... > On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:18:20 GMT, "Stan de SD" > <standesd@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >Ernon was not successful, it's bankrupt. Once again, we were discussing > >liberal animus towards large marketers of consumer items such as Wal-Mart > >and McDonalds. Given that you were unable to respond to that subject > >(interesting because you had such a hair up your ass about Wal-Mart in an > >earlier thread), you jumped onto Enron, confirming the point I have always > >made - most liberals are too stupid to deal with the topic at hand, so they > >need to change the subject. > > Now for McDonald's... > > And then there is the question of what is in those burgers > and of how McD's and other fast food companies have > made work more hazardous for those who work in today's > slaughterhouses because they have so much economic > clout over the industry. Read the well-researched book > Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser. > > http://www.gristmagazine.com/grist/b...ooks081001.asp > > Then there's the food. Three companies grow and process > about 80 percent of all French fries now served by fast food > chains. "The multinational food companies," writes Schlosser, > "operate French fry plants in a number of different regions, > constantly shifting production to take advantage of the lowest > potato prices. Which help them offer the lowest prices to the consumers. > The economic fortunes of individual farmers > or local communities matter little in the grand scheme." Why should they? What gives "individual farmers" or "local communities" the right to demand that they not keep up with the competition? > The > same practices are true in the ranching, poultry, and hog > industries. That's how come we have the cheapest food (cost per houlry wage) in the world, toto. > And if industrial, chemical-reliant farming isn't > disturbing enough, Schlosser next reveals "why the fries > taste good." > > "Flavorists" in laboratories along the New Jersey turnpike > concoct the "natural and artificial flavors" found in almost > every processed food product. McDonald's infuses its fries > and chicken sandwiches with essences that mimic beef > tallow. A milkshake's strawberry flavor is more likely to come > from a test tube than from actual fruit. Yet the list of volatile > chemicals in artificial fruit flavors sounds benign after > reading the story behind a "quarter-pounder." If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Nobody's forcing you to eat there, toto. > To witness the gruesome business of meat-processing, > Schlosser visited slaughterhouses. What he discovered was > both repugnant and hazardous. Sounds like somebody from the city who just figured out where meat comes from - ROTFLMAO!!! > "Anyone who brings raw ground beef into his or her kitchen > today must regard it as a potential biohazard," writes > Schlosser. As if it were safe in days past, and suddenly became dangerous thanks to McDonalds. > High-volume meat production makes it easy for > virulent strains of bacteria to travel far and wide. Schlosser > minces no words in explaining a major source of contamination. > It's simple, he says: "There is shit in the meat." Yet with all the accusations made by the do-gooders, how many people are poisoned with the billions of burgers sold? Let's see the percentages, toto. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|