"jose soplar" <josesoplar@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9312d9f1.0307030838.5506f2b9@posting.google.c om...
> gammajoe8@yahoo.com (gammajoe8) wrote in message
news:<fa544472.0307021153.5fd3997e@posting.google. com>...
> > josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote in message
news:<9312d9f1.0307010828.245d05e0@posting.google. com>...
> > > josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote in message
news:<9312d9f1.0306301452.3cc88b1f@posting.google. com>...
> > > > Twin Sisters of Hell now supreme according to America's highest
court
> > > >
> > > > By Rick Scarborough
> > > >
> > > > On June 26, the Supreme Court of the United States of America
released
> > > > its 6-3 ruling, striking down Texas' statute prohibiting homosexual
> > > > sex as a deviant and destructive behavior. Many astute legal minds
> > > > believe the Supreme Court of America has opened the door to
legalizing
> > > > same-sex marriages, as well as removing restrictions from an
> > > > assortment of what has long been considered aberrant sexual behavior
?
> > > > such as polygamy, bestiality and pedophilia, to name a few.
> > > >
> > > > America's highest court's assault on the culture is now complete,
and
> > > > the twin sisters of slaughtering the innocent and sodomy are now
legal
> > > > and protected rights in the land.
> > > >
> > > > Just as in 1973, when every state in the union was rejecting
abortion
> > > > in referendum after referendum, a majority of the Court overruled,
> > > > making abortion the law of the land, the high court has again taken
> > > > the role of determining what should be considered to be right and
> > > > wrong. Despite the feelings of the ignorant masses, which polling
data
> > > > reveals continues to reject homosexual behavior by overwhelming
> > > > margins, the Supremes have decided the issue for them, legislating
> > > > from the bench, with no recourse for the great majority of the
people
> > > > who believe that God's word proclaims and history verifies that
> > > > homosexual behavior is sinful, destructive and dangerous for the
> > > > culture.
> > > >
> > > > Antonin Scalia, who is being pilloried from the left for his candid
> > > > dissent, with some even calling for his removal from the bench, has
> > > > accurately and courageously, even prophetically, laid this
abominable
> > > > decision at the feet of the six justices who have chosen a side in
the
> > > > culture war, and forcibly imposed their will on the masses of
> > > > religious people in this country who believe God's Word has spoken
on
> > > > this issue.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that if the church of Jesus Christ does not unite and
stand
> > > > with this courageous judge and defend him, and marshal their people
to
> > > > stop an out-of-control federal judiciary, the God who granted us our
> > > > freedoms and who has blessed this country for so long, will soon
move
> > > > in powerful judgment upon the land.
> > > >
> > > > Judge Scalia writes in his dissenting opinion:
> > > >
> > > > ... Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product
of
> > > > a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so
called
> > > > homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some
> > > > homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium
that
> > > > has traditionally attached to the homosexual conduct. I noted in an
> > > > earlier opinion the fact that the American Association of Law
Schools
> > > > (to which any reputable school must seek to belong) excludes from
> > > > membership any school that refuses to ban from its job-interview
> > > > facilities a law firm (no matter how small) that does not wish to
hire
> > > > as a prospective partner a person who openly engages in homosexual
> > > > conduct. See Romer, supra, at 653.
> > > >
> > > > One of the most revealing statements in today's opinion is the
Court's
> > > > grim warning that the criminalization of homosexual conduct is "an
> > > > invitation to subject homosexual persons to discrimination both in
the
> > > > public and in the private spheres." Ante, at 14. It is clear from
this
> > > > that the Court has taken sides in the culture war, departing from
its
> > > > role of assuring, as a neutral observer, that the democratic rules
of
> > > > engagement are observed. Many Americans do not want persons who
openly
> > > > engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as Scout
> > > > masters for their children, as teachers in their children's schools
or
> > > > as boarders in their home. They view this as protecting themselves
and
> > > > their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and
> > > > destructive. The Court views it as "discrimination" which it is the
> > > > function of our judgments to deter. So imbued is the Court with the
> > > > law profession's anti-anti-homosexual culture, that it is seemingly
> > > > unaware that the attitudes of that culture are not obviously
> > > > "mainstream"; that in most states what the Court calls
> > > > "discrimination" against those who engage in homosexual acts is
> > > > perfectly legal ...
> > > >
> > > > Thirty years ago, abortion became the law of the land, to the dismay
> > > > of the majority of Christians who faithfully attend their churches.
No
> > > > one could have predicted that we would destroy 40 million babies and
> > > > have difficulty deciding that killing full term babies through the
> > > > procedure now referred to as partial-birth abortion, was wrong, but
> > > > here we are.
> > > >
> > > > Now we have removed any prohibition of homosexual behavior. What's
> > > > next, bestiality? In his dissent, Justice Scalia raises that very
> > > > possibility, based on this ruling. If the pastors of this land do
not
> > > > stand up on this issue, I am convinced that God will move in swift
and
> > > > powerful judgment on our blessed land. God help us to stand!
> > > >
> > > > Isaiah 3:8-9 makes God's feelings on this matter abundantly clear:
> > > >
> > > > Their words and deeds are against the Lord, defying his glorious
> > > > presence. The look on their faces testifies against them; they
parade
> > > > their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have
> > > > brought disaster upon themselves.
> > > >
> > > > And to the society that tolerates this behavior, He states:
> > > >
> > > > Now I will tell you what I am going to do to my vineyard: I will
take
> > > > away the hedge and it will be destroyed. (Isaiah 5:5).
> > > >
> > > > Pastors and fellow Christians, we have a champion of our values on
the
> > > > Supreme Court. Are we willing to take the heat and stand with him?
> > > > More importantly, are we willing to stand with and for our Lord and
> > > > His word.
> > > >
> > > > The Supreme Court is comprised of men and women, who like us, are
> > > > flawed by sin. They got it wrong with the Dred Scott decision: They
> > > > got it wrong with the Roe v. Wade decision; and they got it wrong
with
> > > > this decision. With every arrogant action which confronts God's
> > > > revealed truth, comes God's justice.
> > > >
> > > > Vision America is looking for courageous Christians who will stand
> > > > with us against such insidious assaults on our faith.
> > > >
> > > >
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/pr...TICLE_ID=33321
> > >
> > > I see that this article struck a few sensitive bottons. It's like
kicking
> > > a pile of horse shit and seeing all the homo-flys swarm up in protest.
> >
> > The Christian right's unlisted 11th Commandment:
> >
> > 11. Man shall not take another man unto himself.
> >
> > Q. Does this also apply to women as they really don't do sodomy?
> >
> > I thought Jesus hated bigots and hypocrites.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe
>
> Jesus may have hated bigotry and hypocrisy, but not bigots
> and hypocrites. I am not God, so you'll have to excuse
> my loathing for the false riligion of liberal leftism.

I have a hard enough time ignoring and excusing your ignorance!

On 3 Jul 2003 09:38:24 -0700, josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote:

>gammajoe8@yahoo.com (gammajoe8) wrote in message news:<fa544472.0307021153.5fd3997e@posting.google. com>...
>> josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote in message news:<9312d9f1.0307010828.245d05e0@posting.google. com>...
>> > josesoplar@aol.com (jose soplar) wrote in message news:<9312d9f1.0306301452.3cc88b1f@posting.google. com>...
>> > > Twin Sisters of Hell now supreme according to America's highest court
>> > >
>> > > By Rick Scarborough
>> > >
>> > > On June 26, the Supreme Court of the United States of America released
>> > > its 6-3 ruling, striking down Texas' statute prohibiting homosexual
>> > > sex as a deviant and destructive behavior. Many astute legal minds
>> > > believe the Supreme Court of America has opened the door to legalizing
>> > > same-sex marriages, as well as removing restrictions from an
>> > > assortment of what has long been considered aberrant sexual behavior ?
>> > > such as polygamy, bestiality and pedophilia, to name a few.
>> > >
>> > > America's highest court's assault on the culture is now complete, and
>> > > the twin sisters of slaughtering the innocent and sodomy are now legal
>> > > and protected rights in the land.
>> > >
>> > > Just as in 1973, when every state in the union was rejecting abortion
>> > > in referendum after referendum, a majority of the Court overruled,
>> > > making abortion the law of the land, the high court has again taken
>> > > the role of determining what should be considered to be right and
>> > > wrong. Despite the feelings of the ignorant masses, which polling data
>> > > reveals continues to reject homosexual behavior by overwhelming
>> > > margins, the Supremes have decided the issue for them, legislating
>> > > from the bench, with no recourse for the great majority of the people
>> > > who believe that God's word proclaims and history verifies that
>> > > homosexual behavior is sinful, destructive and dangerous for the
>> > > culture.
>> > >
>> > > Antonin Scalia, who is being pilloried from the left for his candid
>> > > dissent, with some even calling for his removal from the bench, has
>> > > accurately and courageously, even prophetically, laid this abominable
>> > > decision at the feet of the six justices who have chosen a side in the
>> > > culture war, and forcibly imposed their will on the masses of
>> > > religious people in this country who believe God's Word has spoken on
>> > > this issue.
>> > >
>> > > I believe that if the church of Jesus Christ does not unite and stand
>> > > with this courageous judge and defend him, and marshal their people to
>> > > stop an out-of-control federal judiciary, the God who granted us our
>> > > freedoms and who has blessed this country for so long, will soon move
>> > > in powerful judgment upon the land.
>> > >
>> > > Judge Scalia writes in his dissenting opinion:
>> > >
>> > > ... Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of
>> > > a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so called
>> > > homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some
>> > > homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that
>> > > has traditionally attached to the homosexual conduct. I noted in an
>> > > earlier opinion the fact that the American Association of Law Schools
>> > > (to which any reputable school must seek to belong) excludes from
>> > > membership any school that refuses to ban from its job-interview
>> > > facilities a law firm (no matter how small) that does not wish to hire
>> > > as a prospective partner a person who openly engages in homosexual
>> > > conduct. See Romer, supra, at 653.
>> > >
>> > > One of the most revealing statements in today's opinion is the Court's
>> > > grim warning that the criminalization of homosexual conduct is "an
>> > > invitation to subject homosexual persons to discrimination both in the
>> > > public and in the private spheres." Ante, at 14. It is clear from this
>> > > that the Court has taken sides in the culture war, departing from its
>> > > role of assuring, as a neutral observer, that the democratic rules of
>> > > engagement are observed. Many Americans do not want persons who openly
>> > > engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as Scout
>> > > masters for their children, as teachers in their children's schools or
>> > > as boarders in their home. They view this as protecting themselves and
>> > > their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and
>> > > destructive. The Court views it as "discrimination" which it is the
>> > > function of our judgments to deter. So imbued is the Court with the
>> > > law profession's anti-anti-homosexual culture, that it is seemingly
>> > > unaware that the attitudes of that culture are not obviously
>> > > "mainstream"; that in most states what the Court calls
>> > > "discrimination" against those who engage in homosexual acts is
>> > > perfectly legal ...
>> > >
>> > > Thirty years ago, abortion became the law of the land, to the dismay
>> > > of the majority of Christians who faithfully attend their churches. No
>> > > one could have predicted that we would destroy 40 million babies and
>> > > have difficulty deciding that killing full term babies through the
>> > > procedure now referred to as partial-birth abortion, was wrong, but
>> > > here we are.
>> > >
>> > > Now we have removed any prohibition of homosexual behavior. What's
>> > > next, bestiality? In his dissent, Justice Scalia raises that very
>> > > possibility, based on this ruling. If the pastors of this land do not
>> > > stand up on this issue, I am convinced that God will move in swift and
>> > > powerful judgment on our blessed land. God help us to stand!
>> > >
>> > > Isaiah 3:8-9 makes God's feelings on this matter abundantly clear:
>> > >
>> > > Their words and deeds are against the Lord, defying his glorious
>> > > presence. The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade
>> > > their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have
>> > > brought disaster upon themselves.
>> > >
>> > > And to the society that tolerates this behavior, He states:
>> > >
>> > > Now I will tell you what I am going to do to my vineyard: I will take
>> > > away the hedge and it will be destroyed. (Isaiah 5:5).
>> > >
>> > > Pastors and fellow Christians, we have a champion of our values on the
>> > > Supreme Court. Are we willing to take the heat and stand with him?
>> > > More importantly, are we willing to stand with and for our Lord and
>> > > His word.
>> > >
>> > > The Supreme Court is comprised of men and women, who like us, are
>> > > flawed by sin. They got it wrong with the Dred Scott decision: They
>> > > got it wrong with the Roe v. Wade decision; and they got it wrong with
>> > > this decision. With every arrogant action which confronts God's
>> > > revealed truth, comes God's justice.
>> > >
>> > > Vision America is looking for courageous Christians who will stand
>> > > with us against such insidious assaults on our faith.
>> > >
>> > > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/pr...TICLE_ID=33321
>> >
>> > I see that this article struck a few sensitive bottons. It's like kicking
>> > a pile of horse shit and seeing all the homo-flys swarm up in protest.
>>
>> The Christian right's unlisted 11th Commandment:
>>
>> 11. Man shall not take another man unto himself.
>>
>> Q. Does this also apply to women as they really don't do sodomy?
>>
>> I thought Jesus hated bigots and hypocrites.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Joe
>
>Jesus may have hated bigotry and hypocrisy, but not bigots
>and hypocrites. I am not God, so you'll have to excuse
>my loathing for the false riligion of liberal leftism.

Given the choice between a greedy, heartless, war mongering right wing
religion and a flowers in your hair, silly, caring leberal religion,
I'd be forced to take the liberal one. But keep in mind that Joshua
Bin Joseph (AKA Jesus Christ) was a rebel and a liberal who threw the
capitalist out of the temple, gave away loaves and fishes rather than
over charging for them in a KIOSK, cured the sick for free and even
made some dady wine for free I'd say Jesus would take the Liberals
too.

THOM