"topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:bdqipr$9du$1@news.monmouth.com...

> Lie. No oil has been stolen. Typical liberal propaganda.

Who owns the Iraqi oil?

-b

"topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:bdqipr$9du$1@news.monmouth.com...
>
> <AbelMalcolm@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:5536-3F00C780-418@storefull-2173.public.lawson.webtv.net...
> > There she is, on Hardball, trying to explain why it was no big deal for
> > the Republicans to oppose the Democrats' sponsored war to liberate the
> > Jews in Germany, during World War 2. But then at the same time she
> > continues to argue that it is "treasonous" of Democrats to oppose the
> > Republican sponsored war to steal Iraq's oil.
>
> Lie. No oil has been stolen. Typical liberal propaganda.


We control it. We will make profit from it. I can understand if you're
being straight up and saying we need this oil for our continued supremacy.
That would be honest. But let's be real. We wouldn't give two shits about
the Middle East if it were not for oil. Why do you think that politicians
and oil go so well together?

-JC

robert sez:

"They were both war heros..."
________________________

So was Kruschev, Beria, and all the Commie big shots with chests full of
medals.

<AbelMalcolm@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5536-3F00C780-418@storefull-2173.public.lawson.webtv.net...
> There she is, on Hardball, trying to explain why it was no big deal for
> the Republicans to oppose the Democrats' sponsored war to liberate the
> Jews in Germany, during World War 2. [ . . . ]

I hate to bust your balloon, but there was no "Democrats' sponsored war to
liberate the Jews in Germany, during World War 2."

It's true that Roosevelt lied to the American people throughout the 1940
campaign, promising American mothers that "your sons will not be sent to
fight in a foreign war" even while he was scheming to do exactly that. And
it's true that the Roosevelt administration essentially violated our own
Neutrality Act, winking at the law and shipping war materiel to Britain
while we were still ostensibly neutral. But we didn't get into the war to
"liberate the Jews in Germany." World War II was not about "the Jews in
Germany" at all.


> But then at the same time she
> continues to argue that it is "treasonous" of Democrats to oppose the
> Republican sponsored war to steal Iraq's oil.

Does someone throw you a fish every time you recite that tired old mantra
correctly?


> She says "all Democrats
> are treasonous", she even goes back to John F. Kennedy and Harry Truman,
> accusing them both of treason as well.
>
> Is this pretty little lady just the usual dumb blonde? Or is she the
> quintessential Republican nazi?

Nazis (national socialists) were left wing, just as all socialists are and
of course most Democrats are. If either party resembles the Nazis in any
way, therefore, it is the Democrats.

"Corrector" <nojunk@all.thanks> wrote in message news:2r9Ma.7294$Q%
[...]
> Nazis (national socialists) were left wing, just as all socialists are and
> of course most Democrats are. If either party resembles the Nazis in any
> way, therefore, it is the Democrats.
>

<cough>

While there are plenty of similarties to both parties, there are plenty of
differences as well.

Nazis weren't MERELY national socialists, but religious fanatics.



--
The people who wrote these words are now running this country. Doesn't
anyone care?

'And advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target" specific
genotypes may
transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically
useful tool.'
-page 72, REBUILDING AMERICA'S DEFENSES
Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century
A Report of The Project for the New American Century
September 2000
http://www.newamericancentury.org

"Lawson English" <english7@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:bdro7a$lgu$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net...
> "Corrector" <nojunk@all.thanks> wrote in message news:2r9Ma.7294$Q%
> [...]
> > Nazis (national socialists) were left wing, just as all socialists are
and
> > of course most Democrats are. If either party resembles the Nazis in any
> > way, therefore, it is the Democrats.
> >
>
> <cough>
>
> While there are plenty of similarties to both parties, there are plenty of
> differences as well.
>
> Nazis weren't MERELY national socialists, but religious fanatics.

Not unless you are placing some new and bizarre construction on the term
"religious fanatic."

In article <be1ki8$9kt$1@news.monmouth.com>, topcat says...
>
>
>"B. Nice" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:e32c7745a0424ddee993c9ece4cc4ad7@free.terane ws.com...
>>
>> "topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
>> news:bdqipr$9du$1@news.monmouth.com...
>>
>> > Lie. No oil has been stolen. Typical liberal propaganda.
>>
>> Who owns the Iraqi oil?
>>
>
>The Iraqi people, just like GWB, Rumsfeld, Powell, Condie and everyone else
>in the administration has said over and over. Liberals don't want to believe
>it because then they don't have another so-called "issue" to take up with
>GWB.
>
>TC

NO?
Let's start with:
the environment
our miserably failing economy
international hatred and fear caused by Bush's policies
being a deserter
consistently favoring corporations that commit crimes
unfunded federal mandates
bankrupting America's public schools
turning a blind eye to right-wing terrorists here at home
loss of jobs
transfering tax resources to corporate campaign supporters...

The list grows longer everytime Dumboy opens his twisted lying mouth.

Catherine

CatBox wrote:

>
> NO?
> Let's start with:
> the environment

What exactly has he done to the environment. Be specific now. The Dims still
won't open ANWR.

> our miserably failing economy

Klintons policies and the phony dot.bomb craze coming home to roost.

> international hatred and fear caused by Bush's policies

We on the right like to refer to it as "new found respect for America"

> being a deserter

He looked good on that air-craft carrier, didn't he? It's still bothering
you he did it, isn't it?

> consistently favoring corporations that commit crimes

Not qualified enough to get a job in one of those corporations are you?

> unfunded federal mandates

HAHAHAHAHA! This after 40 YEARS of the DIMS spending us into oblivion. The
DIMS primarily ran the country from about 1945 to 1994 and now we have the
highest national debt ever. Glass houses?

> bankrupting America's public schools

The public schools suck and money isn't the issue. Parental responsibility
is the issue, and that has gone down in proportion to how the liberals have
ruined the country.

> turning a blind eye to right-wing terrorists here at home

I resemble that remark.

> loss of jobs

Klinton's dot.BOMB economy. Nuff said.

> transfering tax resources to corporate campaign supporters...
>

Signing McCain-Feingold.

> The list grows longer everytime Dumboy opens his twisted lying mouth.
>

How does it feel to be in the minority of people who don't like GWB?


TC