Hit send by accident.

Alric Knebel wrote:

> > > and for social programs that elevate the suffering from
> > > poverty.
> >
> > That was the intent, but there is arguement about the success.
>
> A false argument. It did in fact provide relief.

And we now have more of what these programs were meant to fight.

> > > You guys have been lying about it ever since.
> > Evidence please?
>
> Evidence? Well, for one, this constant caricature of what liberals are and
> what they're about. You ignore the past contributions of liberals, and
> focus on the few failures (your response is typical, saying that they
> couldn't have done it without conservatives, and that now-clichéd remark
> about Gore, Sr.).

Both of which are absolute truth.

> We can thank the Republicans for their assistance,
> whatever it was, but the movement was spearheaded by liberal Democrats.
> Period.
>
> > > You're just too stupid.
> >
> > Do you name call to cover a lack of facts?
>
> I call stupid people stupid. That's a fact.

So then you admit that you are just another worthless name caller?

>
>
> Alric

Alric Knebel wrote:

> No. Not worthless. I call it as I see it. You're a right-wing,
> slope-skulled knuckle-dragger worth no more than those names.

Ok thank you for admitting that you lack the intelligence to have a conversation
with educated adults.
I just wish all the worthless, uneducated name callers would start every thread
by admitting it.
Enjoy your stay with the rest of the uneducated, intellectually challenged.

<PLONK>