The Frog wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:56:17 -0600, John Starrett
> <jstarret@carbon.cudenver.edu> wrote:
>
> >"Liberals.HATE.America!'," wrote:
> ><snip>
> >
> >If Clarence Thomas was an affirmative action admission, does
> >not that mean that he wasn't good enough to get in to law
> >school in the first place? Shouldn't he have gotten in based
> >on his ability? I think if he wanted to be taken seriously,
> >he should have demanded his admission be based on merit.
>
> Thomas is criticized as a "race traitor" becuase he took advantage of
> Affirmative Action and yet doesn't believe it is <or was> a lawful
> system.

Race Traitor is a silly accusation. He is either
inconsistent or hypocritical (stretching the definition only
a little).

> My question is to those who *do* think Thomas is a traitor to his race
> is Do you think Ted Kennedy is a traitor to his race as well? Should
> we all owe our alliegance to our race first, and formost?

That is perfectly natural from a biological point of view,
but destructive to our country.

> Wouldn't that make David Duke a frikkin' hero??
<snip>

Yup. That's why "race traitor" is a silly charge, a
diversion from the truth.

--

John Starrett

"It does not require a majority to prevail,
but rather an irate, tireless minority keen
to set brush fires in people's minds."

Samuel Adams

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:41:33 -0600, John Starrett
<jstarret@carbon.cudenver.edu> wrote:

>The Frog wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:56:17 -0600, John Starrett
>> <jstarret@carbon.cudenver.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >"Liberals.HATE.America!'," wrote:
>> ><snip>
>> >
>> >If Clarence Thomas was an affirmative action admission, does
>> >not that mean that he wasn't good enough to get in to law
>> >school in the first place? Shouldn't he have gotten in based
>> >on his ability? I think if he wanted to be taken seriously,
>> >he should have demanded his admission be based on merit.
>>
>> Thomas is criticized as a "race traitor" becuase he took advantage of
>> Affirmative Action and yet doesn't believe it is <or was> a lawful
>> system.
>
>Race Traitor is a silly accusation. He is either
>inconsistent or hypocritical (stretching the definition only
>a little).
>
>> My question is to those who *do* think Thomas is a traitor to his race
>> is Do you think Ted Kennedy is a traitor to his race as well? Should
>> we all owe our alliegance to our race first, and formost?
>
>That is perfectly natural from a biological point of view,
>but destructive to our country.
>
>> Wouldn't that make David Duke a frikkin' hero??
><snip>
>
>Yup. That's why "race traitor" is a silly charge, a
>diversion from the truth.

I agree. The same thing is happening to Colin Powell and Condi Rice.
The epithet "House ******" that was hurled against both of these
powerful cabinet members was saying just that. That they were traitors
to the rest of the Blacks.

Froggy



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++
"The multicultural project will never fully succeed if 'diversity'
is defined as one's own preferred ideologies and political groups."

--Richard E. Redding, "Grappling With Diverse Conceptions of Diversity,"
American Psychologist, April 2002, p. 301.