Re: Paula Jones

Lone Haranguer · Lone Haranguer

You said none of the women brought charges.

You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.

I see you are now running away from that claim.

Typical.
LZ

ROBW wrote:
>
> "One in England did"??
>
> Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit?
>
> Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid.
>
> robw
>
> --
> "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
>
> "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com...
> > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even
> > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted due to
> > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when many
> > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We also
> > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs.
> > LZ
> >
> > ROBW wrote:
> > >
> > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought charges when
> the
> > > "events" actually happened?
> > >
> > > I thought so.
> > >
> > > robw
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > >
> > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m...
> > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>...
> > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy.
> > > > >
> > > > > You puffed up, hero.
> > > > >
> > > > > You;re on.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > LOL! You *DO* need a clue, don't you?
> > > > Think: Catholic Church.
> > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in it for
> the
> > > money?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge holds true,
> > > huh?

Lone Haranguer · Lone Haranguer

ROBW wrote:
>
> This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even know
> her name?

Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims?

June 23, 2003

Subject:
Clinton's Troubles at Oxford
Posted By:
T. Thompson
Date Posted:
January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM

It is a surprise that British students would not care about having
a leader who was reportedly disgraced at
that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that
may even have been the reason for his
leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press
in the UK, but not in the US, during
the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the
US, rape and sexual assault are private
matters, not worth serious examination in a public official.

If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough
to CARE whether it was true that the
head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen
Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's
rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman
before handing over the university to him.

Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...2Fwclin28.html

More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an
excerpt from the story that broke it:

[There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old
English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after
she met him at a pub near the Oxford University
campus where the future President was a student. A
retired State Department employee, who asked not to
be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke
with the family of the girl and filed a report with
his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the
girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's
family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with
Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department
employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young
English woman who said Clinton raped her
in 1969.

''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman
had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But
we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the
embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with
rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was
the last I heard of it.''

Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near
London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week,
but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she
would not go public with further details of the attack.
>
How could you pretend not to have heard about this?

> And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never made
> a peep when the "actions" happened.
>
Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape
where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked.

> And this England case, what was the result?

Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during
the Clinton impeachment.
LZ
>
> robw
>
> --
> "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
>
> "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com...
> > You said none of the women brought charges.
> >
> > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.
> >
> > I see you are now running away from that claim.
> >
> > Typical.
> > LZ
> >
> > ROBW wrote:
> > >
> > > "One in England did"??
> > >
> > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit?
> > >
> > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid.
> > >
> > > robw
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > >
> > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com...
> > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even
> > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted due
> to
> > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when many
> > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We also
> > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs.
> > > > LZ
> > > >
> > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought charges
> when
> > > the
> > > > > "events" actually happened?
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought so.
> > > > >
> > > > > robw
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > >
> > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m...
> > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>...
> > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You puffed up, hero.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You;re on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LOL! You *DO* need a clue, don't you?
> > > > > > Think: Catholic Church.
> > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in it
> for
> > > the
> > > > > money?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge holds
> true,
> > > > > huh?

ROBW · ROBW

Google Lupis had to look it up.
It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you had to
look it up.

And what about the others?
Why did their memories suddenly spark?

If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she was
telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any actions
to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum.

But right now we think she's "on the payroll."

Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support.

robw

--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel

"Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com...
>
>
> ROBW wrote:
> >
> > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even
know
> > her name?
>
> Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims?
>
> June 23, 2003
>
> Subject:
> Clinton's Troubles at Oxford
> Posted By:
> T. Thompson
> Date Posted:
> January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM
>
>
>
> It is a surprise that British students would not care about having
> a leader who was reportedly disgraced at
> that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that
> may even have been the reason for his
> leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press
> in the UK, but not in the US, during
> the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the
> US, rape and sexual assault are private
> matters, not worth serious examination in a public official.
>
> If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough
> to CARE whether it was true that the
> head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen
> Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's
> rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman
> before handing over the university to him.
>
> Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph.
>
>
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2
8%2Fwclin28.html
>
>
> More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an
> excerpt from the story that broke it:
>
> [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old
> English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after
> she met him at a pub near the Oxford University
> campus where the future President was a student. A
> retired State Department employee, who asked not to
> be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke
> with the family of the girl and filed a report with
> his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the
> girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's
> family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with
> Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department
> employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young
> English woman who said Clinton raped her
> in 1969.
>
> ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman
> had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But
> we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the
> embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with
> rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was
> the last I heard of it.''
>
> Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near
> London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week,
> but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she
> would not go public with further details of the attack.
> >
> How could you pretend not to have heard about this?
>
> > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never
made
> > a peep when the "actions" happened.
> >
> Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape
> where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked.
>
> > And this England case, what was the result?
>
> Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during
> the Clinton impeachment.
> LZ
> >
> > robw
> >
> > --
> > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> >
> > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com...
> > > You said none of the women brought charges.
> > >
> > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.
> > >
> > > I see you are now running away from that claim.
> > >
> > > Typical.
> > > LZ
> > >
> > > ROBW wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "One in England did"??
> > > >
> > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid.
> > > >
> > > > robw
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > >
> > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com...
> > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even
> > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted
due
> > to
> > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when
many
> > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We
also
> > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs.
> > > > > LZ
> > > > >
> > > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought
charges
> > when
> > > > the
> > > > > > "events" actually happened?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I thought so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > robw
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m...
> > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>...
> > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You;re on.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LOL! You *DO* need a clue, don't you?
> > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church.
> > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in
it
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > money?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge
holds
> > true,
> > > > > > huh?

Lone Haranguer · Lone Haranguer

ROBW wrote:
>
> Google Lupis had to look it up.

Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges.

You lied again.

> It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you had to
> look it up.

I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the
victims. You denied any made charges.
>
> And what about the others?
> Why did their memories suddenly spark?

They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported.
Some experts say it is higher.
>
> If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she was
> telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any actions
> to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum.

Statute of limitations, dumbo.
>
> But right now we think she's "on the payroll."

"we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed
her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill
the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the
air lately.....
>
> Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support.

Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit.
LZ
>
> robw
>
> --
> "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
>
> "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com...
> >
> >
> > ROBW wrote:
> > >
> > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even
> know
> > > her name?
> >
> > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims?
> >
> > June 23, 2003
> >
> > Subject:
> > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford
> > Posted By:
> > T. Thompson
> > Date Posted:
> > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > It is a surprise that British students would not care about having
> > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at
> > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that
> > may even have been the reason for his
> > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press
> > in the UK, but not in the US, during
> > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the
> > US, rape and sexual assault are private
> > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official.
> >
> > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough
> > to CARE whether it was true that the
> > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen
> > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's
> > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman
> > before handing over the university to him.
> >
> > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph.
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2
> 8%2Fwclin28.html
> >
> >
> > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an
> > excerpt from the story that broke it:
> >
> > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old
> > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after
> > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University
> > campus where the future President was a student. A
> > retired State Department employee, who asked not to
> > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke
> > with the family of the girl and filed a report with
> > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the
> > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's
> > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with
> > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department
> > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young
> > English woman who said Clinton raped her
> > in 1969.
> >
> > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman
> > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But
> > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the
> > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with
> > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was
> > the last I heard of it.''
> >
> > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near
> > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week,
> > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she
> > would not go public with further details of the attack.
> > >
> > How could you pretend not to have heard about this?
> >
> > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never
> made
> > > a peep when the "actions" happened.
> > >
> > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape
> > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked.
> >
> > > And this England case, what was the result?
> >
> > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during
> > the Clinton impeachment.
> > LZ
> > >
> > > robw
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > >
> > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com...
> > > > You said none of the women brought charges.
> > > >
> > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.
> > > >
> > > > I see you are now running away from that claim.
> > > >
> > > > Typical.
> > > > LZ
> > > >
> > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "One in England did"??
> > > > >
> > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit?
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid.
> > > > >
> > > > > robw
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > >
> > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com...
> > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even
> > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted
> due
> > > to
> > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when
> many
> > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We
> also
> > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs.
> > > > > > LZ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought
> charges
> > > when
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > "events" actually happened?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I thought so.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > robw
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m...
> > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>...
> > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You;re on.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LOL! You *DO* need a clue, don't you?
> > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church.
> > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in
> it
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > money?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge
> holds
> > > true,
> > > > > > > huh?

ROBW · ROBW

If the statutes are done, why is she yapping/

Convenient time=Hillary's book?

What was it Carville said about that buck?

robw

--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel

"Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EFA4AF7.52492C9D@direcway.com...
>
>
> ROBW wrote:
> >
> > Google Lupis had to look it up.
>
> Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges.
>
> You lied again.
>
> > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you
had to
> > look it up.
>
> I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the
> victims. You denied any made charges.
> >
> > And what about the others?
> > Why did their memories suddenly spark?
>
> They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported.
> Some experts say it is higher.
> >
> > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she
was
> > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any
actions
> > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum.
>
> Statute of limitations, dumbo.
> >
> > But right now we think she's "on the payroll."
>
> "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed
> her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill
> the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the
> air lately.....
> >
> > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support.
>
> Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit.
> LZ
> >
> > robw
> >
> > --
> > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> >
> > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > ROBW wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't
even
> > know
> > > > her name?
> > >
> > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims?
> > >
> > > June 23, 2003
> > >
> > > Subject:
> > > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford
> > > Posted By:
> > > T. Thompson
> > > Date Posted:
> > > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It is a surprise that British students would not care about
having
> > > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at
> > > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that
> > > may even have been the reason for his
> > > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream
press
> > > in the UK, but not in the US, during
> > > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the
> > > US, rape and sexual assault are private
> > > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official.
> > >
> > > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough
> > > to CARE whether it was true that the
> > > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen
> > > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's
> > > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman
> > > before handing over the university to him.
> > >
> > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2
> > 8%2Fwclin28.html
> > >
> > >
> > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an
> > > excerpt from the story that broke it:
> > >
> > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old
> > > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after
> > > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University
> > > campus where the future President was a student. A
> > > retired State Department employee, who asked not to
> > > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke
> > > with the family of the girl and filed a report with
> > > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the
> > > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's
> > > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with
> > > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department
> > > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young
> > > English woman who said Clinton raped her
> > > in 1969.
> > >
> > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman
> > > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But
> > > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the
> > > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with
> > > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was
> > > the last I heard of it.''
> > >
> > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near
> > > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week,
> > > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she
> > > would not go public with further details of the attack.
> > > >
> > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this?
> > >
> > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all
never
> > made
> > > > a peep when the "actions" happened.
> > > >
> > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell
tape
> > > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked.
> > >
> > > > And this England case, what was the result?
> > >
> > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind
during
> > > the Clinton impeachment.
> > > LZ
> > > >
> > > > robw
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > >
> > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com...
> > > > > You said none of the women brought charges.
> > > > >
> > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim.
> > > > >
> > > > > Typical.
> > > > > LZ
> > > > >
> > > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "One in England did"??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > robw
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com...
> > > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are
even
> > > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever
prosecuted
> > due
> > > > to
> > > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when
> > many
> > > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case.
We
> > also
> > > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs.
> > > > > > > LZ
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought
> > charges
> > > > when
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > "events" actually happened?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I thought so.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > robw
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m...
> > > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You;re on.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > LOL! You *DO* need a clue, don't you?
> > > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church.
> > > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact,
just in
> > it
> > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > money?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge
> > holds
> > > > true,
> > > > > > > > huh?

Lone Haranguer · Lone Haranguer

ROBW wrote:
>
> If the statutes are done, why is she yapping/

She got tired of suffering in silence and being lied about by the
Clintons and their admirers.
>
> Convenient time=Hillary's book?

She was on national TV in 1999. NBC did the interview and then held it
until after the impeachment trial. Wonder why? Those who asked were
told she was TOO credible.
>
> What was it Carville said about that buck?

Carville is the epitome of trailer trash. So is Clinton.
LZ
>
> robw
>
> --
> "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
>
> "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> news:3EFA4AF7.52492C9D@direcway.com...
> >
> >
> > ROBW wrote:
> > >
> > > Google Lupis had to look it up.
> >
> > Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges.
> >
> > You lied again.
> >
> > > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you
> had to
> > > look it up.
> >
> > I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the
> > victims. You denied any made charges.
> > >
> > > And what about the others?
> > > Why did their memories suddenly spark?
> >
> > They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported.
> > Some experts say it is higher.
> > >
> > > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she
> was
> > > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any
> actions
> > > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum.
> >
> > Statute of limitations, dumbo.
> > >
> > > But right now we think she's "on the payroll."
> >
> > "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed
> > her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill
> > the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the
> > air lately.....
> > >
> > > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support.
> >
> > Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit.
> > LZ
> > >
> > > robw
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > >
> > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't
> even
> > > know
> > > > > her name?
> > > >
> > > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims?
> > > >
> > > > June 23, 2003
> > > >
> > > > Subject:
> > > > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford
> > > > Posted By:
> > > > T. Thompson
> > > > Date Posted:
> > > > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It is a surprise that British students would not care about
> having
> > > > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at
> > > > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that
> > > > may even have been the reason for his
> > > > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream
> press
> > > > in the UK, but not in the US, during
> > > > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the
> > > > US, rape and sexual assault are private
> > > > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official.
> > > >
> > > > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough
> > > > to CARE whether it was true that the
> > > > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen
> > > > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's
> > > > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman
> > > > before handing over the university to him.
> > > >
> > > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2
> > > 8%2Fwclin28.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an
> > > > excerpt from the story that broke it:
> > > >
> > > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old
> > > > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after
> > > > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University
> > > > campus where the future President was a student. A
> > > > retired State Department employee, who asked not to
> > > > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke
> > > > with the family of the girl and filed a report with
> > > > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the
> > > > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's
> > > > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with
> > > > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department
> > > > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young
> > > > English woman who said Clinton raped her
> > > > in 1969.
> > > >
> > > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman
> > > > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But
> > > > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the
> > > > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with
> > > > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was
> > > > the last I heard of it.''
> > > >
> > > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near
> > > > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week,
> > > > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she
> > > > would not go public with further details of the attack.
> > > > >
> > > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this?
> > > >
> > > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all
> never
> > > made
> > > > > a peep when the "actions" happened.
> > > > >
> > > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell
> tape
> > > > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked.
> > > >
> > > > > And this England case, what was the result?
> > > >
> > > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind
> during
> > > > the Clinton impeachment.
> > > > LZ
> > > > >
> > > > > robw
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > >
> > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com...
> > > > > > You said none of the women brought charges.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Typical.
> > > > > > LZ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "One in England did"??
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > robw
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com...
> > > > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are
> even
> > > > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever
> prosecuted
> > > due
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when
> > > many
> > > > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case.
> We
> > > also
> > > > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs.
> > > > > > > > LZ
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ROBW wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought
> > > charges
> > > > > when
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > "events" actually happened?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I thought so.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > robw
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m...
> > > > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You;re on.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > LOL! You *DO* need a clue, don't you?
> > > > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church.
> > > > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact,
> just in
> > > it
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > money?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge
> > > holds
> > > > > true,
> > > > > > > > > huh?

George Washington · George Washington

"Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com...
> You said none of the women brought charges.
>
> You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges.
>
> I see you are now running away from that claim.
>
> Typical.

Why not be specific........don't leave us hanging (or with the usual job of
doing your research for you...). I see you're now running from your
"facts". Typical.

George Washington · George Washington

"Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com...
>
>
> ROBW wrote:
> >
> > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even
know
> > her name?
>
> Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims?
>
> June 23, 2003
>
> Subject:
> Clinton's Troubles at Oxford
> Posted By:
> T. Thompson
> Date Posted:
> January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM
>

I see no rape charges in all of that, just a newspaper article with several
quotes. What constabulary did she file the charge with? What was the court
disposition? Oh, surprise - there WERE no formal charges filed, just the
usual unsubstantiated claim and the followup that the "victim" decided to
let the situation go away.

You're batting 1.000 with your unsubstantiated "rumor"-charges, "Red"!

George Washington · George Washington

"Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com...
>

>
> Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph.
>
>
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...2Fwclin28.html
>
>
> More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an
> excerpt from the story that broke it:
>
> [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old
> English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after
> she met him at a pub near the Oxford University
> campus where the future President was a student. A
> retired State Department employee, who asked not to
> be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke
> with the family of the girl and filed a report with
> his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the
> girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's
> family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with
> Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department
> employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young
> English woman who said Clinton raped her
> in 1969.
>
> ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman
> had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But
> we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the
> embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with
> rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was
> the last I heard of it.''

I.e., NO FORMAL CHARGE (more diplomatically put than most of the false
accusations, however)
>
> Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near
> London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week,
> but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she
> would not go public with further details of the attack.

Surprising? Nope.

> >
> How could you pretend not to have heard about this?

Could it be the totally unbiased "source" of the false rumor, "Capitol Hill
Blue, a conservative-leaning website"???

>
> > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never
made
> > a peep when the "actions" happened.
> >
> Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape
> where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked.

Ah yes....the conspiracy angle. What a fool.

>
> > And this England case, what was the result?
>
> Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during
> the Clinton impeachment.

Here are a few excerpts YOU failed to point out:

"The website, run from suburban Virginia, is regarded by Washington insiders
as significantly less reliable than rivals such as the Drudge Report" - very
credible, eh "Red"?

"According to Capitol Hill Blue, the woman - who it says is now married and
lives near London - confirmed that there had been an incident when contacted
last week but refused to go public. It said she had since changed her
telephone number." - perhaps THEY were harassing her, trying to MAKE a story
from nothing?

Capitol Hill Blue's "report admits that a request for any records of the
Oxford incident, filed under freedom of information legislation, failed to
turn up anything." - anyone here surprised?

"The same website also claims to have spoken to an unnamed woman who was
sexually assaulted by Mr Clinton, then a Yale law student, in 1972. She was
22 at the time. According to the report, the woman confirmed the incident
but declined to discuss it further." - more UNNAMED victims!!

Come back with some REAL stuff please, not anything manufactured by unnamed
victims from unnamed sources on rightwing internet websites.

George Washington · George Washington

"Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EFA4AF7.52492C9D@direcway.com...
>
>
> ROBW wrote:
> >
> > Google Lupis had to look it up.
>
> Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges.

Who pressed charges (outside of the press and skin magazines, that is)?
What jurisdiction, what was the disposition of the criminal case?

>
> > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you
had to
> > look it up.
>
> I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the
> victims. You denied any made charges.

There are too many unnamed victims and press releases to keep track of, the
actual "rapes" are easy to keep track of - NONE! Got any REAL charges you
can tell us about?

> >
> > And what about the others?
> > Why did their memories suddenly spark?
>
> They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported.
> Some experts say it is higher.

They told friends, but they went unreported. More than 30 years ago.
Hah....digging pretty deep, aren't you "Red"?

> >
> > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she
was
> > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any
actions
> > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum.
>
> Statute of limitations, dumbo.

But there's no statute of limitations on make dough off a false accusation,
is there?

> >
> > But right now we think she's "on the payroll."
>
> "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed
> her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill
> the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the
> air lately.....

How much did they pay for the interview? THAT is the motivation for these
phony claims.

> >
> > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support.
>
> Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit.

Kinda makes you hungry, doesn't it.

Lone Haranguer	[1] Posted by Lone Haranguer 06-23-2003, 05:26 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote You said none of the women brought charges. You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. I see you are now running away from that claim. Typical. LZ ROBW wrote: > > "One in England did"?? > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit? > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid. > > robw > > -- > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com... > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted due to > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when many > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We also > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs. > > LZ > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought charges when > the > > > "events" actually happened? > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > robw > > > > > > -- > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m... > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>... > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy. > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero. > > > > > > > > > > You;re on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You DO need a clue, don't you? > > > > Think: Catholic Church. > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in it for > the > > > money? > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge holds true, > > > huh?
Posts: n/a

Lone Haranguer	[2] Posted by Lone Haranguer 06-23-2003, 11:04 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote ROBW wrote: > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even know > her name? Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims? June 23, 2003 Subject: Clinton's Troubles at Oxford Posted By: T. Thompson Date Posted: January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM It is a surprise that British students would not care about having a leader who was reportedly disgraced at that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that may even have been the reason for his leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press in the UK, but not in the US, during the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the US, rape and sexual assault are private matters, not worth serious examination in a public official. If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough to CARE whether it was true that the head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman before handing over the university to him. Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...2Fwclin28.html More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an excerpt from the story that broke it: [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford University campus where the future President was a student. A retired State Department employee, who asked not to be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke with the family of the girl and filed a report with his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young English woman who said Clinton raped her in 1969. ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was the last I heard of it.'' Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she would not go public with further details of the attack. > How could you pretend not to have heard about this? > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never made > a peep when the "actions" happened. > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked. > And this England case, what was the result? Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during the Clinton impeachment. LZ > > robw > > -- > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com... > > You said none of the women brought charges. > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim. > > > > Typical. > > LZ > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > "One in England did"?? > > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit? > > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid. > > > > > > robw > > > > > > -- > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com... > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted due > to > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when many > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We also > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs. > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought charges > when > > > the > > > > > "events" actually happened? > > > > > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m... > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>... > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You;re on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You DO need a clue, don't you? > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church. > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in it > for > > > the > > > > > money? > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge holds > true, > > > > > huh?
Posts: n/a

ROBW	[3] Posted by ROBW 06-25-2003, 12:04 AM
Posts: n/a	Quote Google Lupis had to look it up. It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you had to look it up. And what about the others? Why did their memories suddenly spark? If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she was telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any actions to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum. But right now we think she's "on the payroll." Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support. robw -- "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com... > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even know > > her name? > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims? > > June 23, 2003 > > Subject: > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford > Posted By: > T. Thompson > Date Posted: > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM > > > > It is a surprise that British students would not care about having > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that > may even have been the reason for his > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press > in the UK, but not in the US, during > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the > US, rape and sexual assault are private > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official. > > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough > to CARE whether it was true that the > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman > before handing over the university to him. > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph. > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2 8%2Fwclin28.html > > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an > excerpt from the story that broke it: > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University > campus where the future President was a student. A > retired State Department employee, who asked not to > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke > with the family of the girl and filed a report with > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young > English woman who said Clinton raped her > in 1969. > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was > the last I heard of it.'' > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she > would not go public with further details of the attack. > > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this? > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never made > > a peep when the "actions" happened. > > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked. > > > And this England case, what was the result? > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during > the Clinton impeachment. > LZ > > > > robw > > > > -- > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com... > > > You said none of the women brought charges. > > > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. > > > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim. > > > > > > Typical. > > > LZ > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > "One in England did"?? > > > > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit? > > > > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid. > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > -- > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com... > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted due > > to > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when many > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We also > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs. > > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought charges > > when > > > > the > > > > > > "events" actually happened? > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m... > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>... > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You;re on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You DO need a clue, don't you? > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church. > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in it > > for > > > > the > > > > > > money? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge holds > > true, > > > > > > huh?
Posts: n/a

Lone Haranguer	[4] Posted by Lone Haranguer 06-25-2003, 10:23 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote ROBW wrote: > > Google Lupis had to look it up. Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges. You lied again. > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you had to > look it up. I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the victims. You denied any made charges. > > And what about the others? > Why did their memories suddenly spark? They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported. Some experts say it is higher. > > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she was > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any actions > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum. Statute of limitations, dumbo. > > But right now we think she's "on the payroll." "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the air lately..... > > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support. Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit. LZ > > robw > > -- > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com... > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even > know > > > her name? > > > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims? > > > > June 23, 2003 > > > > Subject: > > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford > > Posted By: > > T. Thompson > > Date Posted: > > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM > > > > > > > > It is a surprise that British students would not care about having > > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at > > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that > > may even have been the reason for his > > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press > > in the UK, but not in the US, during > > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the > > US, rape and sexual assault are private > > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official. > > > > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough > > to CARE whether it was true that the > > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen > > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's > > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman > > before handing over the university to him. > > > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph. > > > > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2 > 8%2Fwclin28.html > > > > > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an > > excerpt from the story that broke it: > > > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old > > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after > > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University > > campus where the future President was a student. A > > retired State Department employee, who asked not to > > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke > > with the family of the girl and filed a report with > > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the > > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's > > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with > > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department > > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young > > English woman who said Clinton raped her > > in 1969. > > > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman > > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But > > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the > > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with > > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was > > the last I heard of it.'' > > > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near > > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, > > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she > > would not go public with further details of the attack. > > > > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this? > > > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never > made > > > a peep when the "actions" happened. > > > > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape > > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked. > > > > > And this England case, what was the result? > > > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during > > the Clinton impeachment. > > LZ > > > > > > robw > > > > > > -- > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com... > > > > You said none of the women brought charges. > > > > > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. > > > > > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim. > > > > > > > > Typical. > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "One in England did"?? > > > > > > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit? > > > > > > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid. > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com... > > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even > > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted > due > > > to > > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when > many > > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We > also > > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs. > > > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought > charges > > > when > > > > > the > > > > > > > "events" actually happened? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m... > > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>... > > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You;re on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You DO need a clue, don't you? > > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church. > > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in > it > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > > > money? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge > holds > > > true, > > > > > > > huh?
Posts: n/a

ROBW	[5] Posted by ROBW 06-25-2003, 11:13 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote If the statutes are done, why is she yapping/ Convenient time=Hillary's book? What was it Carville said about that buck? robw -- "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message news:3EFA4AF7.52492C9D@direcway.com... > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > Google Lupis had to look it up. > > Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges. > > You lied again. > > > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you had to > > look it up. > > I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the > victims. You denied any made charges. > > > > And what about the others? > > Why did their memories suddenly spark? > > They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported. > Some experts say it is higher. > > > > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she was > > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any actions > > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum. > > Statute of limitations, dumbo. > > > > But right now we think she's "on the payroll." > > "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed > her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill > the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the > air lately..... > > > > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support. > > Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit. > LZ > > > > robw > > > > -- > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com... > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even > > know > > > > her name? > > > > > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims? > > > > > > June 23, 2003 > > > > > > Subject: > > > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford > > > Posted By: > > > T. Thompson > > > Date Posted: > > > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a surprise that British students would not care about having > > > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at > > > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that > > > may even have been the reason for his > > > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream press > > > in the UK, but not in the US, during > > > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the > > > US, rape and sexual assault are private > > > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official. > > > > > > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough > > > to CARE whether it was true that the > > > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen > > > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's > > > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman > > > before handing over the university to him. > > > > > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph. > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2 > > 8%2Fwclin28.html > > > > > > > > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an > > > excerpt from the story that broke it: > > > > > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old > > > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after > > > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University > > > campus where the future President was a student. A > > > retired State Department employee, who asked not to > > > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke > > > with the family of the girl and filed a report with > > > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the > > > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's > > > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with > > > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department > > > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young > > > English woman who said Clinton raped her > > > in 1969. > > > > > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman > > > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But > > > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the > > > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with > > > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was > > > the last I heard of it.'' > > > > > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near > > > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, > > > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she > > > would not go public with further details of the attack. > > > > > > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this? > > > > > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never > > made > > > > a peep when the "actions" happened. > > > > > > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape > > > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked. > > > > > > > And this England case, what was the result? > > > > > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during > > > the Clinton impeachment. > > > LZ > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > -- > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com... > > > > > You said none of the women brought charges. > > > > > > > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. > > > > > > > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim. > > > > > > > > > > Typical. > > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > "One in England did"?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit? > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid. > > > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com... > > > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are even > > > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever prosecuted > > due > > > > to > > > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when > > many > > > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. We > > also > > > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs. > > > > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought > > charges > > > > when > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > "events" actually happened? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m... > > > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>... > > > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You;re on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You DO need a clue, don't you? > > > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church. > > > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, just in > > it > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > money? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge > > holds > > > > true, > > > > > > > > huh?
Posts: n/a

Lone Haranguer	[6] Posted by Lone Haranguer 06-26-2003, 06:13 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote ROBW wrote: > > If the statutes are done, why is she yapping/ She got tired of suffering in silence and being lied about by the Clintons and their admirers. > > Convenient time=Hillary's book? She was on national TV in 1999. NBC did the interview and then held it until after the impeachment trial. Wonder why? Those who asked were told she was TOO credible. > > What was it Carville said about that buck? Carville is the epitome of trailer trash. So is Clinton. LZ > > robw > > -- > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > news:3EFA4AF7.52492C9D@direcway.com... > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > Google Lupis had to look it up. > > > > Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges. > > > > You lied again. > > > > > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you > had to > > > look it up. > > > > I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the > > victims. You denied any made charges. > > > > > > And what about the others? > > > Why did their memories suddenly spark? > > > > They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported. > > Some experts say it is higher. > > > > > > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she > was > > > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any > actions > > > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum. > > > > Statute of limitations, dumbo. > > > > > > But right now we think she's "on the payroll." > > > > "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed > > her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill > > the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the > > air lately..... > > > > > > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support. > > > > Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit. > > LZ > > > > > > robw > > > > > > -- > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't > even > > > know > > > > > her name? > > > > > > > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims? > > > > > > > > June 23, 2003 > > > > > > > > Subject: > > > > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford > > > > Posted By: > > > > T. Thompson > > > > Date Posted: > > > > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a surprise that British students would not care about > having > > > > a leader who was reportedly disgraced at > > > > that institution for rape charges while a student--charges that > > > > may even have been the reason for his > > > > leaving Oxford. These charges were covered in the mainstream > press > > > > in the UK, but not in the US, during > > > > the US impeachment. But, apparently in the UK, as we saw in the > > > > US, rape and sexual assault are private > > > > matters, not worth serious examination in a public official. > > > > > > > > If I were on the Board of Oxford I would be old-fashioned enough > > > > to CARE whether it was true that the > > > > head of my university had been drummed out for raping Eileen > > > > Wellstone and whether Miss Wellstone's > > > > rape charges were true. I would at least interview the woman > > > > before handing over the university to him. > > > > > > > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...F1999%2F02%2F2 > > > 8%2Fwclin28.html > > > > > > > > > > > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an > > > > excerpt from the story that broke it: > > > > > > > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old > > > > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after > > > > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University > > > > campus where the future President was a student. A > > > > retired State Department employee, who asked not to > > > > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke > > > > with the family of the girl and filed a report with > > > > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the > > > > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's > > > > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with > > > > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department > > > > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young > > > > English woman who said Clinton raped her > > > > in 1969. > > > > > > > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman > > > > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But > > > > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the > > > > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with > > > > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was > > > > the last I heard of it.'' > > > > > > > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near > > > > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, > > > > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she > > > > would not go public with further details of the attack. > > > > > > > > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this? > > > > > > > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all > never > > > made > > > > > a peep when the "actions" happened. > > > > > > > > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell > tape > > > > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked. > > > > > > > > > And this England case, what was the result? > > > > > > > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind > during > > > > the Clinton impeachment. > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com... > > > > > > You said none of the women brought charges. > > > > > > > > > > > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. > > > > > > > > > > > > I see you are now running away from that claim. > > > > > > > > > > > > Typical. > > > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "One in England did"?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wanna fill in the blanks, nitwit? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, and we're in amerika, stupid. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > news:3EF67113.DC031A74@direcway.com... > > > > > > > > One in England did. Experts say less than 10% of rapes are > even > > > > > > > > reported. A tiny fraction of those reported are ever > prosecuted > > > due > > > > > to > > > > > > > > lack of evidence. Also Clinton was in positions of power when > > > many > > > > > > > > occurred. The victims knew they had no chance to win a case. > We > > > also > > > > > > > > know some were threatened by Bubba's thugs. > > > > > > > > LZ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you can't explain why none of these women ever brought > > > charges > > > > > when > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > "events" actually happened? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > robw > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > "Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "eflorack" <eflorack@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > > > news:bd154db5.0306210758.299761f@posting.google.co m... > > > > > > > > > > "ROBW" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message > > > > > > > > > news:<9p2cnTQwtMJ-a26jXTWJjQ@comcast.com>... > > > > > > > > > > > Tell you what,you name them if it's so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You puffed up, hero. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You;re on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! You DO need a clue, don't you? > > > > > > > > > > Think: Catholic Church. > > > > > > > > > > Are those attacking her, so many years after the fact, > just in > > > it > > > > > for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > money? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. It's only when they attack LEFTISTS that charge > > > holds > > > > > true, > > > > > > > > > huh?
Posts: n/a

George Washington	[7] Posted by George Washington 06-28-2003, 12:48 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message news:3EF76291.85279E1F@direcway.com... > You said none of the women brought charges. > > You lied. A fellow student in England DID bring charges. > > I see you are now running away from that claim. > > Typical. Why not be specific........don't leave us hanging (or with the usual job of doing your research for you...). I see you're now running from your "facts". Typical.
Posts: n/a

George Washington	[8] Posted by George Washington 06-28-2003, 12:52 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com... > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > This "fellow student" rings so true in your heart that you don't even know > > her name? > > Who can keep track of all the Clinton rape victims? > > June 23, 2003 > > Subject: > Clinton's Troubles at Oxford > Posted By: > T. Thompson > Date Posted: > January 17, 2003, 6:42 PM > I see no rape charges in all of that, just a newspaper article with several quotes. What constabulary did she file the charge with? What was the court disposition? Oh, surprise - there WERE no formal charges filed, just the usual unsubstantiated claim and the followup that the "victim" decided to let the situation go away. You're batting 1.000 with your unsubstantiated "rumor"-charges, "Red"!
Posts: n/a

George Washington	[9] Posted by George Washington 06-28-2003, 01:04 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message news:3EF7B1CA.E5141AFE@direcway.com... > > > Here is a rather sedate version of the story from the Telegraph. > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...2Fwclin28.html > > > More sensational ones also ran in the British press. Here is an > excerpt from the story that broke it: > > [There is a] 1969 charge by a Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old > English woman who said Clinton assaulted her after > she met him at a pub near the Oxford University > campus where the future President was a student. A > retired State Department employee, who asked not to > be identified, confirmed this week that he spoke > with the family of the girl and filed a report with > his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the > girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's > family declined to pursue the case; . . . In an interview with > Capitol Hill Blue, the retired State Department > employee said he believed the story Miss Wellstone, the young > English woman who said Clinton raped her > in 1969. > > ''There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman > had suffered severe emotional trauma,'' he said. ''But > we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the > embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with > rape. I filed a report with my superiors and that was > the last I heard of it.'' I.e., NO FORMAL CHARGE (more diplomatically put than most of the false accusations, however) > > Miss Wellstone, who is now married and lives near > London, confirmed the incident when contacted this week, > but refused to discuss the matter further. She said she > would not go public with further details of the attack. Surprising? Nope. > > > How could you pretend not to have heard about this? Could it be the totally unbiased "source" of the false rumor, "Capitol Hill Blue, a conservative-leaning website"??? > > > And it still doesn't explain why Juanita, Paula, Jennifer, et all never made > > a peep when the "actions" happened. > > > Fear. Many people still fear Clinton. Ever listen to that Hubbell tape > where he phoned his wife? She knew they were dead meat if he talked. Ah yes....the conspiracy angle. What a fool. > > > And this England case, what was the result? > > Read the article. You must have really been deaf, dumb and blind during > the Clinton impeachment. Here are a few excerpts YOU failed to point out: "The website, run from suburban Virginia, is regarded by Washington insiders as significantly less reliable than rivals such as the Drudge Report" - very credible, eh "Red"? "According to Capitol Hill Blue, the woman - who it says is now married and lives near London - confirmed that there had been an incident when contacted last week but refused to go public. It said she had since changed her telephone number." - perhaps THEY were harassing her, trying to MAKE a story from nothing? Capitol Hill Blue's "report admits that a request for any records of the Oxford incident, filed under freedom of information legislation, failed to turn up anything." - anyone here surprised? "The same website also claims to have spoken to an unnamed woman who was sexually assaulted by Mr Clinton, then a Yale law student, in 1972. She was 22 at the time. According to the report, the woman confirmed the incident but declined to discuss it further." - more UNNAMED victims!! Come back with some REAL stuff please, not anything manufactured by unnamed victims from unnamed sources on rightwing internet websites.
Posts: n/a

George Washington	[10] Posted by George Washington 06-28-2003, 01:09 PM
Posts: n/a	Quote "Lone Haranguer" <linusz@direcway.com> wrote in message news:3EFA4AF7.52492C9D@direcway.com... > > > ROBW wrote: > > > > Google Lupis had to look it up. > > Whereas you claimed no one EVER pressed charges. Who pressed charges (outside of the press and skin magazines, that is)? What jurisdiction, what was the disposition of the criminal case? > > > It was so much a part of your part and parcel daily thoughts that you had to > > look it up. > > I told you there were too many Clinton rapes to keep track of all the > victims. You denied any made charges. There are too many unnamed victims and press releases to keep track of, the actual "rapes" are easy to keep track of - NONE! Got any REAL charges you can tell us about? > > > > And what about the others? > > Why did their memories suddenly spark? > > They told friends at the time, remember? 90% of rapes go unreported. > Some experts say it is higher. They told friends, but they went unreported. More than 30 years ago. Hah....digging pretty deep, aren't you "Red"? > > > > If Juanita was raped, then help her get a lawyer and if it's shown she was > > telling the truth we absolutely promise that we will help you in any actions > > to make sure Clinton pays the price. Rape is the crime of scum. > > Statute of limitations, dumbo. But there's no statute of limitations on make dough off a false accusation, is there? > > > > But right now we think she's "on the payroll." > > "we think" doesn't count for shit. The network people who interviewed > her were so certain she was telling the truth that they tried to kill > the interview. Notice the lady who pushed airing it hasn't been on the > air lately..... How much did they pay for the interview? THAT is the motivation for these phony claims. > > > > Prove us wrong and you will have our 100% support. > > Your support isn't worth a saucer of warm spit. Kinda makes you hungry, doesn't it.
Posts: n/a

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode