Paintball Forums  
User Name
Password

Paintball Forums > General > Chit Chat > Politics > Repugs, the Party of Dirty Tricks

Reply
AbelMalcolm@webtv.net
[1] Posted by AbelMalcolm@webtv.net 06-22-2003, 06:05 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a
few of my postings were not posted by me at all, but by some person or
persons who have been impersonating me. And they have posted lots of
vile threatening remarks, racist messages, and obscene pictures. I get
angry e-mails sometimes, because many people think that I am the one who
did those terrible things.

The imposters managed to duplicate my e-mail address exactly, and they
posted a lot of malicious ugliness with it. Their intent was obviously
to build up complaints about me, so that my account gets canceled, and
to ruin my reputation so that people stop reading my posts. This is a
very dirty trick! But it's the type of stuff we can expect from
Republicans.

This reminds me of Nixon's campaign against Edmund Muskie. Nixon
operatives broke into candidate Muskie's office, stole letterheads with
his logo on it, they then wrote nasty racist messages to newspaper
editors across the country. It appeared like Edmund Muskie wrote those
letters, those letters were published, and Edmund Muskie's political
career was permanently damaged because of this.

What the imposters did to me was nothing less than a high tech version
of the same thing. As we enter the 21st century, the Republican party
is still in the dark ages of dictatorial tyranny. Abraham Lincoln would
turn in his grave if he could see what has happened, the degeneration of
what was once a proud and honorable political party.

Ow, and BTW, George Herbert Walker Bush (the pResident's father) was the
person who was in charge of CREEP (Campaign to Re-Elect the President),
read about all their dirty tricks below.
Go to this link, or read excerpt below:
http://www.colorado.edu/AmStudies/lewis/2010/water.htm

In 1971, according to Nixon aide, Patrick Buchanan, their primary
objective was to "prevent Muskie from sweeping the early primaries."
Nixon's people felt that Senator Muskie was the greatest political
threat to Nixon's re-election. Nixon's men hired agents to infiltrate
the Democratic candidates' campaign, steal documents, bug phones, spread
slanderous and false stories, and undermine the candidates' characters.
These agents sent false memos on campaign stationary accusing their
Democratic opponents of adultery, homosexuality, drunkenness, and
consorting with prostitutes. They also called press conferences and set
up meetings with prominent political groups and didn't tell the
candidates, so that the press and these groups would think they had been
slighted. In addition, they threw smoke bombs at Press conferences,
created and sold derogatory bumper stickers, and even hired a woman to
run outside of Muskie's hotel room naked, shouting "I love Muskie."

As you can imagine all these mysterious activities soon took their toll
on the candidates. Everything seemed to be going wrong for their
campaigns, and they just couldn't figure out why.

Nixon's agents planted false news stories in a New Hampshire newspaper
accusing Muskie's wife of being an alcoholic, being a lewd woman, and
slandering French Canadians. This was the last straw for Muskie, he was
furious. He called a press conference and couldn't control his anger
and began to cry. This ruined his chances to be elected President,
because the press and the media accused him of being unstable. If they
only knew what was really going on?

After getting rid of Muskie, Nixon's agents focused on undermining the
campaigns of Humphrey, Jackson, and Bayh. As Patrick Buchanan again
wrote: "We must do as little as possible at this time to impede
McGovern's rise." In fact, Nixon and his Republican agents actually
succeeded in helping McGovern win the Democratic nomination for
President.

They then ran against McGovern, charging that he was a dangerous radical
who supported "abortion, amnesty, and acid."

But Nixon's men didn't stop with destroying all the Democratic
candidates.
They were now becoming really cocky and aggressive.

Nixon wanted to make sure that he was re-elected, so his men now
targeted the Democratic Party and the Democratic Convention. They drew
up plans to wiretap the convention, bug the hotel rooms, bug prominent
Democrats' phones, and steal campaign documents.

In May 1972, one of Nixon's team went into the Democratic National
headquarters in the Watergate building and planted bugs on all the
phones and copied and stole campaign documents. But by mid-June one of
the bugs they had planted had stopped working, so they sent in a team to
replace the bug and steal more documents. But this time, on June, 17,
1972, Nixon's men were caught. Five men were charged with breaking into
the Democratic Party headquarters, and two other men were caught inside
the Watergate building and also charged.

President Nixon now had a real problem: How could he explain the fact
that seven men who worked on his campaign to re-elect the President
(CREEP) were caught breaking into Democratic Party headquarters?

On June, 23, 1972, Richard Nixon ordered a cover-up of the Watergate
break-in, telling John Mitchell, the attorney general of the United
States:
"I don't give a shit what happens, I want you to stonewall it...save the
plan."

Throughout the summer of 1972, President Nixon and his top aides tried
to use all the powers of the government that they could, in order to
undermine the investigation of the Watergate scandal.
But by November 1972, despite the fact that some of his own campaign
workers were in jail facing felony charges, Nixon was able to get
re-elected in a landslide.

But, as we now know, Nixon's election was in fact rigged; through
illegal dirty tricks, Nixon had ensured his own re-election. The 1972
election was in no way a free and fair election.

[My note: the 2000 election was in no way a free and fair election
either]

For more info, go to this link:
http://www.colorado.edu/AmStudies/lewis/2010/water.htm

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Educate yourself & go to these sites:

http://www.VoterMarch.org &
http://www.bushneverwonflorida.com & http://www.BUSHorCHIMP.com

 
Sponsored Links
Jim
[2] Posted by Jim 06-23-2003, 02:03 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>...

> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a
> few of my postings were not posted by me at all


And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your
subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you?
Seek help.

Jim
 
Erik A. Mattila
[3] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-23-2003, 09:05 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote:
>
>
> Jim wrote:
>
>> AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message
>> news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
>>
>>
>>> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
>>> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a
>>> few of my postings were not posted by me at all

>>
>>
>>
>> And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your
>> subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you?
>> Seek help.

>
>
> he's not the only lefty who believes this.
>
> I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google
> systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts.


Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to
dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform.

eam

>
>
>


 
Marilyn
[4] Posted by Marilyn 06-23-2003, 09:42 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
"Erik A. Mattila" wrote:

> Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote:
> >
> >
> > Jim wrote:
> >
> >> AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message
> >> news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
> >>
> >>
> >>> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
> >>> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a
> >>> few of my postings were not posted by me at all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your
> >> subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you?
> >> Seek help.

> >
> >
> > he's not the only lefty who believes this.
> >
> > I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google
> > systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts.

>
> Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to
> dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform.
>
> eam


We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based
email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to
be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed
the list of right wingies.

MW

>
>
> >
> >
> >





 
Erik A. Mattila
[5] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-23-2003, 10:03 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
Marilyn wrote:

>>>I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google
>>>systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts.

>>
>>Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to
>>dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform.
>>
>>eam

>
>
> We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based
> email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to
> be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed
> the list of right wingies.
>
> MW


Really? They think Coulter is political? Then what choices do they give
you for pornography?

eam


 
Jim
[6] Posted by Jim 06-24-2003, 11:50 AM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
Marilyn <agathena@nix2spam.com> wrote in message news:<3EF79E8D.BBB9E23C@nix2spam.com>...
> "Erik A. Mattila" wrote:
>
> > Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim wrote:
> > >
> > >> AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message
> > >> news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
> > >>> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a
> > >>> few of my postings were not posted by me at all
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your
> > >> subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you?
> > >> Seek help.
> > >
> > >
> > > he's not the only lefty who believes this.
> > >
> > > I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google
> > > systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts.

> >
> > Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to
> > dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform.
> >
> > eam

>
> We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based
> email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to
> be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed
> the list of right wingies.


Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available commentary:

Opinions from USA Today
Commentary from New York Post
Ann Coulter
Maggie Gallgher
Richard Reeves
Ted Rall
William F. Buckley

Jim
 
Erik A. Mattila
[7] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-24-2003, 03:39 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
Jim wrote:
> Marilyn <agathena@nix2spam.com> wrote in message news:<3EF79E8D.BBB9E23C@nix2spam.com>...
>
>>"Erik A. Mattila" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message
>>>>>news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
>>>>>>the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a
>>>>>>few of my postings were not posted by me at all
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your
>>>>>subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you?
>>>>>Seek help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>he's not the only lefty who believes this.
>>>>
>>>>I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google
>>>>systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts.
>>>
>>>Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to
>>>dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform.
>>>
>>>eam

>>
>>We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based
>>email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to
>>be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed
>>the list of right wingies.

>
>
> Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available commentary:
>
> Opinions from USA Today
> Commentary from New York Post
> Ann Coulter
> Maggie Gallgher
> Richard Reeves
> Ted Rall
> William F. Buckley
>
> Jim


Jim, didn't you learn your ACB's real good? (just kidding)

eam


 
Jim
[8] Posted by Jim 06-24-2003, 06:35 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
"Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message news:<3EF89AC8.9030009@oco.net>...

> >>We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based
> >>email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to
> >>be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed
> >>the list of right wingies.


> > Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available
> > commentary:
> >
> > Opinions from USA Today
> > Commentary from New York Post
> > Ann Coulter
> > Maggie Gallgher
> > Richard Reeves
> > Ted Rall
> > William F. Buckley


> Jim, didn't you learn your ACB's real good? (just kidding)


Hey, I can't help it if the people at yahoo alphabatise people by
thier first name. One just wonders if they list titles beginning with
"The" under "T" - which is NOT funny if you ever had to work with
someone that did so.

Jim
 
Erik A. Mattila
[9] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-24-2003, 07:11 PM
 
Posts: n/a


Quote
Jim wrote:
> "Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message news:<3EF89AC8.9030009@oco.net>...
>
>
>>>>We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based
>>>>email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to
>>>>be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed
>>>>the list of right wingies.
>>>

>
>>>Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available
>>>commentary:
>>>
>>> Opinions from USA Today
>>> Commentary from New York Post
>>> Ann Coulter
>>> Maggie Gallgher
>>> Richard Reeves
>>> Ted Rall
>>> William F. Buckley

>>

>
>>Jim, didn't you learn your ACB's real good? (just kidding)

>
>
> Hey, I can't help it if the people at yahoo alphabatise people by
> thier first name. One just wonders if they list titles beginning with
> "The" under "T" - which is NOT funny if you ever had to work with
> someone that did so.
>
> Jim


Funny thing is, I just realized that that's what happened as I hit the
'send' button. After an initial flush of embarassment, I had hoped no
one would notice. Thank my lucky stars I wrote "just kidding."

Erik


 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY Earl Camembert Paintball Discussion 0 12-31-2003 04:49 PM
Pumps VS Semis At the Fall Castle Conquest at EMR Excalibur Acid Paintball Discussion 10 09-11-2003 12:05 PM
The Republican Party is still a haven for bigots. Harry Hope Politics 5 07-07-2003 12:58 AM
Re: Re-districting a "horror movie" to the ailing Democrat Party Steve Politics 0 07-04-2003 09:33 AM
Re: Repugs, the Party of Dirty Tricks AbelMalcolm@webtv.net Politics 1 06-23-2003 02:59 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0