|
![]() |
|
|
[1] Posted by AbelMalcolm@webtv.net 06-22-2003, 06:05 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during
the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a few of my postings were not posted by me at all, but by some person or persons who have been impersonating me. And they have posted lots of vile threatening remarks, racist messages, and obscene pictures. I get angry e-mails sometimes, because many people think that I am the one who did those terrible things. The imposters managed to duplicate my e-mail address exactly, and they posted a lot of malicious ugliness with it. Their intent was obviously to build up complaints about me, so that my account gets canceled, and to ruin my reputation so that people stop reading my posts. This is a very dirty trick! But it's the type of stuff we can expect from Republicans. This reminds me of Nixon's campaign against Edmund Muskie. Nixon operatives broke into candidate Muskie's office, stole letterheads with his logo on it, they then wrote nasty racist messages to newspaper editors across the country. It appeared like Edmund Muskie wrote those letters, those letters were published, and Edmund Muskie's political career was permanently damaged because of this. What the imposters did to me was nothing less than a high tech version of the same thing. As we enter the 21st century, the Republican party is still in the dark ages of dictatorial tyranny. Abraham Lincoln would turn in his grave if he could see what has happened, the degeneration of what was once a proud and honorable political party. Ow, and BTW, George Herbert Walker Bush (the pResident's father) was the person who was in charge of CREEP (Campaign to Re-Elect the President), read about all their dirty tricks below. Go to this link, or read excerpt below: http://www.colorado.edu/AmStudies/lewis/2010/water.htm In 1971, according to Nixon aide, Patrick Buchanan, their primary objective was to "prevent Muskie from sweeping the early primaries." Nixon's people felt that Senator Muskie was the greatest political threat to Nixon's re-election. Nixon's men hired agents to infiltrate the Democratic candidates' campaign, steal documents, bug phones, spread slanderous and false stories, and undermine the candidates' characters. These agents sent false memos on campaign stationary accusing their Democratic opponents of adultery, homosexuality, drunkenness, and consorting with prostitutes. They also called press conferences and set up meetings with prominent political groups and didn't tell the candidates, so that the press and these groups would think they had been slighted. In addition, they threw smoke bombs at Press conferences, created and sold derogatory bumper stickers, and even hired a woman to run outside of Muskie's hotel room naked, shouting "I love Muskie." As you can imagine all these mysterious activities soon took their toll on the candidates. Everything seemed to be going wrong for their campaigns, and they just couldn't figure out why. Nixon's agents planted false news stories in a New Hampshire newspaper accusing Muskie's wife of being an alcoholic, being a lewd woman, and slandering French Canadians. This was the last straw for Muskie, he was furious. He called a press conference and couldn't control his anger and began to cry. This ruined his chances to be elected President, because the press and the media accused him of being unstable. If they only knew what was really going on? After getting rid of Muskie, Nixon's agents focused on undermining the campaigns of Humphrey, Jackson, and Bayh. As Patrick Buchanan again wrote: "We must do as little as possible at this time to impede McGovern's rise." In fact, Nixon and his Republican agents actually succeeded in helping McGovern win the Democratic nomination for President. They then ran against McGovern, charging that he was a dangerous radical who supported "abortion, amnesty, and acid." But Nixon's men didn't stop with destroying all the Democratic candidates. They were now becoming really cocky and aggressive. Nixon wanted to make sure that he was re-elected, so his men now targeted the Democratic Party and the Democratic Convention. They drew up plans to wiretap the convention, bug the hotel rooms, bug prominent Democrats' phones, and steal campaign documents. In May 1972, one of Nixon's team went into the Democratic National headquarters in the Watergate building and planted bugs on all the phones and copied and stole campaign documents. But by mid-June one of the bugs they had planted had stopped working, so they sent in a team to replace the bug and steal more documents. But this time, on June, 17, 1972, Nixon's men were caught. Five men were charged with breaking into the Democratic Party headquarters, and two other men were caught inside the Watergate building and also charged. President Nixon now had a real problem: How could he explain the fact that seven men who worked on his campaign to re-elect the President (CREEP) were caught breaking into Democratic Party headquarters? On June, 23, 1972, Richard Nixon ordered a cover-up of the Watergate break-in, telling John Mitchell, the attorney general of the United States: "I don't give a shit what happens, I want you to stonewall it...save the plan." Throughout the summer of 1972, President Nixon and his top aides tried to use all the powers of the government that they could, in order to undermine the investigation of the Watergate scandal. But by November 1972, despite the fact that some of his own campaign workers were in jail facing felony charges, Nixon was able to get re-elected in a landslide. But, as we now know, Nixon's election was in fact rigged; through illegal dirty tricks, Nixon had ensured his own re-election. The 1972 election was in no way a free and fair election. [My note: the 2000 election was in no way a free and fair election either] For more info, go to this link: http://www.colorado.edu/AmStudies/lewis/2010/water.htm <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Educate yourself & go to these sites: http://www.VoterMarch.org & http://www.bushneverwonflorida.com & http://www.BUSHorCHIMP.com |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
[2] Posted by Jim 06-23-2003, 02:03 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during > the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a > few of my postings were not posted by me at all And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you? Seek help. Jim |
|
|
|
[3] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-23-2003, 09:05 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote:
> > > Jim wrote: > >> AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message >> news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>... >> >> >>> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during >>> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a >>> few of my postings were not posted by me at all >> >> >> >> And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your >> subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you? >> Seek help. > > > he's not the only lefty who believes this. > > I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google > systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts. Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform. eam > > > |
|
|
|
[4] Posted by Marilyn 06-23-2003, 09:42 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"Erik A. Mattila" wrote:
> Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote: > > > > > > Jim wrote: > > > >> AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message > >> news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>... > >> > >> > >>> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during > >>> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a > >>> few of my postings were not posted by me at all > >> > >> > >> > >> And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your > >> subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you? > >> Seek help. > > > > > > he's not the only lefty who believes this. > > > > I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google > > systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts. > > Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to > dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform. > > eam We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed the list of right wingies. MW > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
[5] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-23-2003, 10:03 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
Marilyn wrote:
>>>I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google >>>systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts. >> >>Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to >>dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform. >> >>eam > > > We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based > email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to > be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed > the list of right wingies. > > MW Really? They think Coulter is political? Then what choices do they give you for pornography? eam |
|
|
|
[6] Posted by Jim 06-24-2003, 11:50 AM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
Marilyn <agathena@nix2spam.com> wrote in message news:<3EF79E8D.BBB9E23C@nix2spam.com>...
> "Erik A. Mattila" wrote: > > > Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > > >> AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message > > >> news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>... > > >> > > >> > > >>> If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during > > >>> the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a > > >>> few of my postings were not posted by me at all > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your > > >> subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you? > > >> Seek help. > > > > > > > > > he's not the only lefty who believes this. > > > > > > I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google > > > systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts. > > > > Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to > > dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform. > > > > eam > > We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based > email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to > be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed > the list of right wingies. Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available commentary: Opinions from USA Today Commentary from New York Post Ann Coulter Maggie Gallgher Richard Reeves Ted Rall William F. Buckley Jim |
|
|
|
[7] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-24-2003, 03:39 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
Jim wrote:
> Marilyn <agathena@nix2spam.com> wrote in message news:<3EF79E8D.BBB9E23C@nix2spam.com>... > >>"Erik A. Mattila" wrote: >> >> >>>Steven D. Litvintchouk wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Jim wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>AbelMalcolm@webtv.net wrote in message >>>>>news:<24019-3EF61A0A-235@storefull-2171.public.lawson.webtv.net>... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>If you do a Google search on some of my old postings, especially during >>>>>>the contentious presidential election of 2000, you will see that quite a >>>>>>few of my postings were not posted by me at all >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>And you attribute this to the republicans in general as per your >>>>>subject line? Wow! So you think the RNC is plotting against you? >>>>>Seek help. >>>> >>>> >>>>he's not the only lefty who believes this. >>>> >>>>I've heard other lefties on this NG and elsewhere who think that Google >>>>systematically censors out left-wing posts in favor of right-wing posts. >>> >>>Yeah, that's pretty wackie. Google only censors intelligent posts to >>>dumb-down the ngs and protect its populist platform. >>> >>>eam >> >>We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based >>email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to >>be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed >>the list of right wingies. > > > Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available commentary: > > Opinions from USA Today > Commentary from New York Post > Ann Coulter > Maggie Gallgher > Richard Reeves > Ted Rall > William F. Buckley > > Jim Jim, didn't you learn your ACB's real good? (just kidding) eam |
|
|
|
[8] Posted by Jim 06-24-2003, 06:35 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message news:<3EF89AC8.9030009@oco.net>...
> >>We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based > >>email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to > >>be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed > >>the list of right wingies. > > Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available > > commentary: > > > > Opinions from USA Today > > Commentary from New York Post > > Ann Coulter > > Maggie Gallgher > > Richard Reeves > > Ted Rall > > William F. Buckley > Jim, didn't you learn your ACB's real good? (just kidding) Hey, I can't help it if the people at yahoo alphabatise people by thier first name. One just wonders if they list titles beginning with "The" under "T" - which is NOT funny if you ever had to work with someone that did so. Jim |
|
|
|
[9] Posted by Erik A. Mattila 06-24-2003, 07:11 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
Jim wrote:
> "Erik A. Mattila" <emattila@oco.net> wrote in message news:<3EF89AC8.9030009@oco.net>... > > >>>>We know where Yahoo is politically. For my web-based >>>>email account, they gave me a choice of columnists to >>>>be featured on 'my_yahoo' page. Ann Coulter headed >>>>the list of right wingies. >>> > >>>Well, alphabetically speaking, she would head the list of available >>>commentary: >>> >>> Opinions from USA Today >>> Commentary from New York Post >>> Ann Coulter >>> Maggie Gallgher >>> Richard Reeves >>> Ted Rall >>> William F. Buckley >> > >>Jim, didn't you learn your ACB's real good? (just kidding) > > > Hey, I can't help it if the people at yahoo alphabatise people by > thier first name. One just wonders if they list titles beginning with > "The" under "T" - which is NOT funny if you ever had to work with > someone that did so. > > Jim Funny thing is, I just realized that that's what happened as I hit the 'send' button. After an initial flush of embarassment, I had hoped no one would notice. Thank my lucky stars I wrote "just kidding." Erik |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY | Earl Camembert | Paintball Discussion | 0 | 12-31-2003 04:49 PM |
| Pumps VS Semis At the Fall Castle Conquest at EMR | Excalibur Acid | Paintball Discussion | 10 | 09-11-2003 12:05 PM |
| The Republican Party is still a haven for bigots. | Harry Hope | Politics | 5 | 07-07-2003 12:58 AM |
| Re: Re-districting a "horror movie" to the ailing Democrat Party | Steve | Politics | 0 | 07-04-2003 09:33 AM |
| Re: Repugs, the Party of Dirty Tricks | AbelMalcolm@webtv.net | Politics | 1 | 06-23-2003 02:59 PM |