|
![]() |
|
|
[1] Posted by Bulletproof_PDX 07-24-2003, 05:22 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
Howdy,
I have a "stock" Phantom pump which I play with most often (suits my style of play). I prefer maneuvering, finding angles, flanking and bunkering, to sitting behind a structure and trading paint (not that any other style of play is less valid, but that is just my preference). With the feed tube and 12 gram it's very lightweight with a very low profile. I have an urge to outfit my autococker with a 10 round feed tube and 12 gram quick changer. It's arguably more accurate than my Phantom, and I thought it might give my style of play a slight edge. Has anyone else tried this (on the field) with any success? Would the gas efficiency just be too prohibitive? I wouldn't think that it would be, but I'm not sure. Or, would I automatically get laughed off the field before I get a chance to try? Thanks! -Bulletproof_PDX |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
[2] Posted by Jeff Goslin 07-24-2003, 05:42 PM |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote
"Bulletproof_PDX" <bulletproof_pdx@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9671d29a.0307241222.2f5d59b6@posting.google.c om... > I have an urge to outfit my autococker with a 10 round feed tube and > 12 gram quick changer. It's arguably more accurate than my Phantom, > and I thought it might give my style of play a slight edge. Only one problem. The urge to use a semi-automatic marker in a semi-automatic manner is often to great to ignore. That means that when you actually DO bunker someone, out of pure reaction, you fire at least 3-4 shots into the opponent in the bunker, and maybe one or two on the run in. With a cocker running constant air and a hopper, that's hardly worth noticing, but when you get 10 shots from your 12 gram, and 10 shots in your tube, it's a different matter entirely. The way a Phantom, PGP or other true stock class gun prevents this is by having the pump to remind you that you have to make your one shot count. No shots on the way in, only one shot as you bunker the guy. You *KNOW* you can't rely on firepower to get you out of your problem. > Has anyone else tried this (on the field) with any success? Would the > gas efficiency just be too prohibitive? I wouldn't think that it > would be, but I'm not sure. Or, would I automatically get laughed off > the field before I get a chance to try? I've known people who have tried. When you get right down to it, if you have semi-auto capabilities at your disposal, you're much more likely to waste paint and air, no matter how limited you are in your on gun paint and air. My recommendation is to stick with your Phantom, OR convert your cocker into a pumper. Many people have BRILLIANT success with their Snipers(the pump version of the cocker). -- Jeff Goslin - MCSD It's not a god complex when you're always right http://www.goslin.info |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Smart Parts Autococker | osckey | Other Markers | 10 | 11-26-2005 08:05 PM |
| MQ-Valve + PBX Autococker | BigBoss | Cockers | 14 | 06-10-2005 02:03 AM |
| Finally got an autococker! | Bruce Chang | Paintball Discussion | 16 | 05-25-2005 12:16 PM |
| FA: Competition Autococker Package | Donnaich | Paintball Discussion | 10 | 12-12-2003 03:18 AM |
| Autococker, Alternative Air | Ayar15 | Paintball Discussion | 4 | 10-24-2003 04:41 AM |