"hc23hc" <hc23hc@art.line> wrote in message
news:3F094A2A.649C4DF6@art.line...
> Roger wrote:
> >
> > "Stan de SD" <standesd@earthlink.net> wrote
> > >
> > > No. First of all, it wasn't successful, and secondly, it was an
example of
> > > the negligence of the SEC under Clinton's watch.
> >
> > Are you saying that corporations are not responsible for their own
actions?
> > That they are only responsible if aggressively monitored by the
government?
> > That if the government doesn't watch every move they make, they turn
corupt
> > and steal money from their shareholders and "customers?" Sounds like you
> > agree with me.
>
>
> It's exactly what Stain was saying, but almost certainly not
> what he thought he was saying. Unless maybe, after a marathon
> weekend of lurid, disoriented trolling of usenet (hopped up on
> copious quantities of formaldehyde-spiked canned beer he found
> on sale at a nearby K-Mart) Stain was suddenly struck by the
> mother of all epiphanies... along lines similar to these :

Notice how hc won't jump in until the other idiots show (Roger, toto) show
up, since she's only comfortable discussing issues among her peers...