"Jeff Goslin" <autockr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:O_GdnTka76sDxLfcRVn-gw@comcast.com...
>
> And, if you could follow a line of reasoning

If you would advance a line of reasoning rather than a collection of blind
biases and myths I might make the effort, but as it is....

>Unfortunately, you
> can't seem to grasp the notion I'm putting forth.

Unless our theoretical game is taking place on a piece of land in the middle
of a swamp beside a nature preserve, then your image of a worthless piece of
land is questionable at best. How many lawyers of the predatory variety
would pass up getting their hands on almost any piece of land in or near a
city? Who knows, in a couple of years it might be the site of a new mall --
real estate is almost always worth acquiring, they aren't making any more of
it. If the owner doesn't have much money, excellent! He signs over the
land in lieu of a judgement, land is almost as good as money in the long
run.

And so on, blah blah, Jeff counter blah blahs whether he really believes
what he's saying or not, blah, we all go to sleep.